88mphSlayer's forum posts

Avatar image for 88mphSlayer
88mphSlayer

3201

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 88mphSlayer
Member since 2010 • 3201 Posts

looks fantastic

@GOTY argument, there's lots to choose from this year, it's going to be HARD, Reach is going up against Starcraft 2, Mass Effect 2, Red Dead Redemption, Super Mario Galaxy 2, etc.

good times for everybody

but yeah i think Reach has it in the bag for best Halo game

Avatar image for 88mphSlayer
88mphSlayer

3201

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 88mphSlayer
Member since 2010 • 3201 Posts

t3h gam3s

hence why i own all 3 consoles

Avatar image for 88mphSlayer
88mphSlayer

3201

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 88mphSlayer
Member since 2010 • 3201 Posts

[QUOTE="Espada12"]

Batman, Gears 2, Borderlands, NG2, ME1+2 and dragon age.

Sp4rtan_3

Your so right about ME2, they could of done so much better then that set piece battle where I just took cover the entire time taking pop shots. ME1 a much better more fleshed out boss battle.

really? ME1's final boss fight was basically just saren bunny hopping all over the place, there wasn't any strategy or anything to it, at least ME2's final boss fight had something going on even if it was pretty mild

also i liked Uncharted 1's boss fight, albeit i consider the entire barge sequence the boss fight, not just the QTE finisher

i'd say Bioshock is the biggest candidate for "worst boss in a wonderful game"

Avatar image for 88mphSlayer
88mphSlayer

3201

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 88mphSlayer
Member since 2010 • 3201 Posts

[QUOTE="88mphSlayer"]

[QUOTE="gamebreakerz__"] If Sony had released a less powerful unit back then then they of course would have more sales and cash but isn't it clear that Sonys objectives are not pure cash like nintendo, but actually providing the best gaming experience to the user.Tyrant156

you should look up "convergence device"

building consoles hasn't really primarily been about gaming since the PS2 launched :?

if anything the Wii is the only console on the market designed primarily for gaming

Which is a bad thing, that's like buying a cell phone that just made phone calls, technology should merge. Why have 3 seperate devices when you can ahve them all in one.

not saying it's a bad thing, just pointing out that if you had 2 phones, both place calls, except one has more features, but the other is cheaper... it's hard to say that the one with more features cares more about phone calls

especially when phone calls is the only thing the cheaper phone has going for it

Avatar image for 88mphSlayer
88mphSlayer

3201

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 88mphSlayer
Member since 2010 • 3201 Posts

[QUOTE="88mphSlayer"]

[QUOTE="gamebreakerz__"] If Sony had released a less powerful unit back then then they of course would have more sales and cash but isn't it clear that Sonys objectives are not pure cash like nintendo, but actually providing the best gaming experience to the user.gamebreakerz__

you should look up "convergence device"

building consoles hasn't really primarily been about gaming since the PS2 launched :?

if anything the Wii is the only console on the market designed primarily for gaming

Primarily for casual gaming, to suggest that the PS3 and 360 were not targeted at gaming is dumb. Sure, Sony marketed the PS3 as a bluray player because it was the cheapest bluray player at the time and they knew people would buy games if they got a PS3. The wii is not targeted at games, its targeted at money.

they're all targeted at money

and yes being primarily focused at casual gaming is still being primarily focused at gaming

whereas the PS3 was shipped with a web browser, music playback, bluray and dvd playback, linux, digital card readers, etc.

the only problem for Sony is that Microsoft made digital services more popular than physical services, hence why Sony has constantly removed hardware features and later introduced a digital service

but either way, Microsoft and Sony are in the business of making convergence devices, that's been their plan for ages and both have talked about their goal of making a single device you use for everything in the living room since the 90's

Avatar image for 88mphSlayer
88mphSlayer

3201

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 88mphSlayer
Member since 2010 • 3201 Posts

[QUOTE="Tyrant156"][QUOTE="walkingdream"] Sony is a business like every other company:|they are out their to make money.

gamebreakerz__

That's the first mistake of business if you think that way then you'll never be successful. A Company's major focus is to meet a need, when you do that profits come automatically.

Exactly, after seeing the wii and 360, they knew flooding the market with the same stuff wouldn't work, so they made something better, knowing it would pay off. Thats the same with all of Sonys products, TVs, cameras, you name it they most likely have the superior equipment, thats just the way they operate.

they're okay, but if you want the best you have to shop around, get a samsung tv, onkyo/klipsch/etc. for sound, canon or nikon for camera, etc.

they were top dog like 5 years ago, but nowadays they're mostly a nice backup

not to mention their prices always put them in the range or higher than better devices, at least they aren't like Bosch

Avatar image for 88mphSlayer
88mphSlayer

3201

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 88mphSlayer
Member since 2010 • 3201 Posts

[QUOTE="NotTarts"]

[QUOTE="gamebreakerz__"] The author, he says that they dug a hole with the bluray because it costs to much and they should've created a less powerful unit. Sure, they lost a few billion $ but now they are making a profit and will do so for the rest of this 10 year cycle, and they have a much better system.gamebreakerz__

It's not really just about operating loss and income. The PS3 probably would have sold a lot better than it did if it was at a lower price. I remember opening up a newspaper, seeing the PS3 advertised for AUD$899, and thinking 'no way in hell'.

Which console you prefer really just comes down to taste. As much as I like the PS3, I find the Xbox 360 to be better suited to what I wanted, which is why I ended up getting the Xbox 360 S over the PS3 Slim.

If Sony had released a less powerful unit back then then they of course would have more sales and cash but isn't it clear that Sonys objectives are not pure cash like nintendo, but actually providing the best gaming experience to the user.

you should look up "convergence device"

building consoles hasn't really primarily been about gaming since the PS2 launched :?

if anything the Wii is the only console on the market designed primarily for gaming

Avatar image for 88mphSlayer
88mphSlayer

3201

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 88mphSlayer
Member since 2010 • 3201 Posts

Spore

Avatar image for 88mphSlayer
88mphSlayer

3201

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 88mphSlayer
Member since 2010 • 3201 Posts

For the same reason why as you get older you stop watching sesame street and Barney. As people get older their tastes mature.

Second, the Wii has a very innovative control scheme but its not being used to its full potential. The quality of games are lacking. For every great Wii game you can name I can name 10 others on other consoles that are of equal or better quality.Diablo-B

same goes for corny mature stuff

when i was a kid i played toejam & earl, sonic, mortal kombat, etc.

now all that stuff seems so damn corny, gore in general nowadays feels like a joke that's more funny than cool

i guess if you grew up only playing nintendo games it'd seem corny and childish, but i think those games were probably deeper than what i played as a kid

Avatar image for 88mphSlayer
88mphSlayer

3201

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 88mphSlayer
Member since 2010 • 3201 Posts

Sony attempted to replicate their destruction of the Dreamast brand against the 360, and it backfired horribly

which was blasphemy back in 2006/2007, Sony was like the Pope of consoles, so seeing them tripping on their own shoelaces gave everybody else ammunition - which they capitalized on, to the detriment of many a sony fanboy, turning this gen into a mopey emotional soap opera of "whose the bigger underdog? *sniff* *sniff*", somehow because Sony screwed up more and delivered less they deserved to win, and that's where the "year of PS3" started - like the PS3 was the return of the jedi against the microsoft sith or some such melodrama

3 years later all of that energy seems to have transformed into hating OnLive, Activision, and casual games, as gamers go on a crusade against something that's always been around but never threatened them