AWolfoftheCalla's forum posts

Avatar image for AWolfoftheCalla
AWolfoftheCalla

162

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 AWolfoftheCalla
Member since 2011 • 162 Posts
Why are people still complaining about this? Co-op was never promised, and the way you did multi-player in Demon's Souls was obviously a circumventing of the system that the developer did not encourage. So to actually cut off that circumventing, you are now in lobbies, so you probably won't find your friend. You can't play with your friends. Period. If you were expecting to play with your friends, you should have done more research before buying the game. If you want to play with your friends, go play Gears of War 3. So either toughen up or sell the game. I am 35 hours into Dark Souls, and am mostly done with the main story, and I have not once used my white soapstone (my choice). I am very grateful for many of the notes left for me, and I hope my notes have helped others. That's the way you play, with a vague sense of community, and gratefulness to a stranger. The game isn't the way you specifically want it, well that's too bad. Personally, I prefer it the way it is.homegirl2180
35 hours? really? i know people who have been playing for 80-100 and they still arent done. you are apparently blazing through.... or not having any issues with the difficulty.
Avatar image for AWolfoftheCalla
AWolfoftheCalla

162

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 AWolfoftheCalla
Member since 2011 • 162 Posts

[QUOTE="AWolfoftheCalla"][QUOTE="neogeta8"]

I've been waiting for this game since completing the first game! Preordered it as soon as it was possible too. This game is going to be amazing and doesn't need to be blowing it's own trumpet because everyone with an ounce of knowledge knows this game is going to be one of THE best games in years.

gameofthering

except it isnt made by the original studio, which is never a good thing. please, list one series that has changed developers half way down the line and been better for it. i cant think of any.



It is made by the same studio though :? It was made by Rocksteady.

i thought he was talking about halo 4... it is ambiguous considering the last few posts were talking about it rather than batman.

Avatar image for AWolfoftheCalla
AWolfoftheCalla

162

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 AWolfoftheCalla
Member since 2011 • 162 Posts
[QUOTE="Noobverest"]Actually I was mostly referring to Wolf, and slightly clarifying the specifics promised by the directors yet wasn't delivered to us. I don't see any reason why From Software would make a game that only allowed strangers to connect (they never said only strangers may connect; just no communication between players). Again, I remember mentioning that in my previous post; The director has never specifically said that they intended for friends to be unable to connect. They only disabled voice chat and texting between friends because they wanted to have the atmosphere of having a helping hand yet no form of communication would be possible because of how the game's story is placed. If you read the sun guy's dialogue, he specifically said that with the white soapstone you would be able to summon other souls; allowing souls from another time frame to temporarily help, and a being from another time frame would not be able to actively converse with another being. Point being: Don't say that the developers made the game so that you would be playing with strangers all the time. The developers never specifically said that, all they did was that you would be get a co-operative play without communication. The only problem right now with the "impossible to play with friend" is the server system. From the previous article I linked, there was a very disturbing news. The game has a connecting system which allows players to connect to others in their respective geographical region. The online system would be perfectly fine in Japan due to high concentrations of gamers located in areas such as Osaka, or Tokyo. However, in North America people are far away, making a more widely spread gaming population causing a limited multi-player interaction which I believe was unintended by the developers. The reason I typed the previous bunch of text is because, for Japanese players they might have friends really nearby and in their geographical regions. So I believe that Japanese players are actually able to connect with their friends because of how close they live together, however this is not possible in North America servers. And if Japanese players are actually able to connect with their friends or anyone at all (which is not the case in North America); then it is also the fault of From Software or Namco Bandai for not allowing North American players to be able to indulge in the same experience. Also, I have seen numerous advertisements and game articles that specifically noted that you would be able to play with your friends pre-release of Dark Souls, pumping up much of the Demon's Souls players for the game. However, it turns out that it was a big bucket of feces handed to the consumers. There is only a lot of dissatisfaction when something gets promised but isn't delivered. Main problem is how Demon's Souls multi-player is actually better than Dark Souls; yet the developers themselves said the Dark Souls multi-player would be improved upon that of Demon's Souls. I also remember reading that in an article somewhere, Software themselves said that Dark Souls mulit-player would enable you to specifically summon your friends, yes SPECIFICALLY SUMMON YOUR FRIENDS (I am not sure how trust worthy this phrase was, because I was linked by a hardcore Demon's Souls fan that I have as a friend). Since I believe in From Software completely, I would assume that this game they produced was somehow modified or screwed up by the publisher Namco Bandai. They might have changed the server system to decrease sever load by separating players into multiple servers, but reducing the overall multi-player interaction intended.

i call BS on them ever stating that you could specifically summon friends, and i know for a fact that it was said they did not intend you to play with friends. so...not sure what to tell you.
Avatar image for AWolfoftheCalla
AWolfoftheCalla

162

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 AWolfoftheCalla
Member since 2011 • 162 Posts

[QUOTE="ChristopherRage"]

That's like going to a restaurant and ordering a meal and then complaining that they didn't make your food the way you wanted it.

Spikenenspikspi

LOL, sorry but I just had to login and tell you that's the stupidest f*****g analogy I've ever heard.

indeed... if my food wasnt made the way i wanted it... i would complain!
Avatar image for AWolfoftheCalla
AWolfoftheCalla

162

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 AWolfoftheCalla
Member since 2011 • 162 Posts

[QUOTE="AWolfoftheCalla"][QUOTE="Byshop"]

Great post, Noobverest. Unfortunately the detractors in this thread are more interested in just flaming than actually discussing the pros and cons of the multiplayer in Dark Souls.

-Byshop

Byshop

actually if you had any logical thought in your brain, you would have been able to follow the fact that the topic creator was complaining that he couldnt play with friends.... and a few of us were point out that dark souls was never meant to be played with friends. whether or not the matchmaking system is working properly from a technical standpoint is A COMPLETELY DIFFERENT TOPIC. from personal experience, i would say that there is clearly something wrong with how the servers match people. THIS HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE TOPIC OF THE THREAD HOWEVER. im sorry you werent able to follow the thread.

Wolf,

I read noobverest's post (along with the entire thread) very carefully, and I'm pretty sure noobverest's post was in response to istuffedsunny's post and not yours. Both noobverest and I were arguing in favor of your position that co-op is exactly as it should be in Dark Souls. Before you accuse me of not following the thread, why don't read all of my posts and not just take my last post out of context.

The point is, I agree with you but if you're going to act like a jerk you're on your own.

-Byshop

actually... if you look, he is quoting me, and telling me i am wrong.

"Noobverest wrote: I don't think you've done proper research on how the developers wanted the game to be either, so you're not allowed to criticize anyone."

when in fact... i am very RIGHT. he is arguing that the technical nature of the multiplayer is not functioning properly... which i agree. it clearly isnt working right as you almost never find people waiting to be summoned. HOWEVER, that was NOT the topic of discussion in this thread..... the thread was created to discuss why the game didnt allow you to play with friends directly.... he is arguing something completely different from the intent of the thread, and i corrected him.

i dont see how that is me being a jerk. i see that as me keeping the thread on topic...

Avatar image for AWolfoftheCalla
AWolfoftheCalla

162

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 AWolfoftheCalla
Member since 2011 • 162 Posts

Like the other poster said, it's a generic shooter. It looks great but its linear and after a couple of missions it gets old and stale. The AI isn't good at all and because its programmed the bad guys are always in the same place doing the same thing if you have to start over on a mission. It takes all the challenge out of it. I already took my copy back to Game Stop and traded it in.Palehorse2211

this... this is pretty much **** right here. yes the game does get boring fast, and yes it is generic... but the AI is EXCELLENT.

i 100% promise this person has never played the game. If there is anything about rage that is to be praised, its the graphics and the AI. both are superb.

Avatar image for AWolfoftheCalla
AWolfoftheCalla

162

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 AWolfoftheCalla
Member since 2011 • 162 Posts

I've been waiting for this game since completing the first game! Preordered it as soon as it was possible too. This game is going to be amazing and doesn't need to be blowing it's own trumpet because everyone with an ounce of knowledge knows this game is going to be one of THE best games in years.

neogeta8
except it isnt made by the original studio, which is never a good thing. please, list one series that has changed developers half way down the line and been better for it. i cant think of any.
Avatar image for AWolfoftheCalla
AWolfoftheCalla

162

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 AWolfoftheCalla
Member since 2011 • 162 Posts

[QUOTE="AWolfoftheCalla"][QUOTE="doubalfa"]I don't see anyone talking about Halo 4...am I the only one who is getting it?Master_Of_Fools

yes... considering its own director abandoned it about a month ago and left the company.

LOL Halo 4 is over a year away. And it was a lead designer that left Frank said it doesnt effect them at all he only developed some of the scenery and he left cause he felt like it wasnt a challenge for him. He was used to join Japanese art styles and this was just not doing it for him.

actually, he left because microsoft wanted to take the game in a direction he didnt approve of..... try actually READING the article.
Avatar image for AWolfoftheCalla
AWolfoftheCalla

162

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 AWolfoftheCalla
Member since 2011 • 162 Posts

One of the main reasons why I got this game was to play with friends and have fun... Now I am wishing I never got this game.

topcat5665
and that is your fault for not doing research on the game before buying, not the developers. perhaps next time you will be a little more diligent huh?