I wouldn't go that far. The only thing people criticized was Raiden? There were far more relevant complaints made than just Raiden. Raiden is one of the least substantial and viable complaints of the later MGS games in my opinion.Not at all! I always thought Kojima's stories were always the same. The only thing that people criticized was Raiden, but Metal Gear Solid 3 got the game back on track. It was one of my favorite last-gen games, maybe even one of my favorite games of all time. And MGS 3: Subsistence only took it to another level, a very high level.
Even though MGS 2 was criticized, the gameplay was still Metal Gear-"Solid," if you know what I mean.So no, MGS was always about the gameplay for me, and every version delivered, especially the third one.
ASK_Story
Yes I absolutely agree that the gameplay has been solid throughout the entire series and has never skipped a beat as far as I'm concerned, but don't sell MGS short. There is far more to the allure of MGS than just how fun it is to play (in the times you actually get a chance to control it of course). There is a lot of emotion in it's cinematics, deep connection the player feels for it's characters, and an atmosphere that sucks you in and makes you believe that these characters and the crisis at hand are real and important to you as well as the game world's inhabitants.
MGS without dialogue, cinematics, and script......... well it's certainly not MGS.
(EDIT) Did my spaces disappear due to some technical issue, or is it just me?
Log in to comment