ApocalypseXIVV's forum posts

Avatar image for ApocalypseXIVV
ApocalypseXIVV

1988

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#1 ApocalypseXIVV
Member since 2004 • 1988 Posts
im glad you like them...personally, i havent even gotten the update yet...i love achievements and have been building my gamerscore since a few years ago. For that reason, im not that excited about trophys becuase games that are multiplatform im going to get on 360 mostly since i already have the majority of my score on the 360. But for games exclusive to the PS3 i am very exiceted to test out the trophy system...i wish they would have done this so MGS4 would have had them though...
Avatar image for ApocalypseXIVV
ApocalypseXIVV

1988

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#2 ApocalypseXIVV
Member since 2004 • 1988 Posts
[QUOTE="Mordred19"][QUOTE="sonicmj1"][QUOTE="Cedmln"]

"Very badly written"

Only to those who can't understand.

sonicmj1

The words "verbal diarrhea" are not used to describe things that are incomprehensible. They're used to describe things that have too much talking.

MGS4 fits that description.

If you watched the cutscenes and were confused about any of the game's primary messages, you'd have to be pretty dense, considering how frequently they hit you over the head with them.

So do you mean to say the dialogue gets rendundant?

Exactly what I mean.

[/QUOTE

zero puncutation:

1. you are not funny. yes, your reviews are humurous, but never during any of your reviews have i even chuckled.

2. you have no taste if you didn't like the mgs4 story and found it boring

mistervengeance

i dont think he didnt like it, just found the cutscenes overly long and a tad convaluted i can understand that...i dont agree with it...but i can understand someone sitting there saying "jesus shut up i just wanna play the damn game"

Avatar image for ApocalypseXIVV
ApocalypseXIVV

1988

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#3 ApocalypseXIVV
Member since 2004 • 1988 Posts

He was wrong in so many aspects, especially the gameplay. You don't have to stand up to shoot :|ChrnoTrigger

if your up against a wall and want to shoot over the top of the wall, you have to get off the wall and stand up to shoot thats what hes talking about

Avatar image for ApocalypseXIVV
ApocalypseXIVV

1988

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#4 ApocalypseXIVV
Member since 2004 • 1988 Posts
looks fine to me, dont notice any slowdown...really reaching for straws here...its a 10, get over it
Avatar image for ApocalypseXIVV
ApocalypseXIVV

1988

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#5 ApocalypseXIVV
Member since 2004 • 1988 Posts
people have answered the TCs question and yet this topic still goes on. i think we can all conclude the TC wasnt actually looking for an answer but rather trolling...so lets move on
Avatar image for ApocalypseXIVV
ApocalypseXIVV

1988

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#6 ApocalypseXIVV
Member since 2004 • 1988 Posts

A VERY slim chance, next to GTA, MGS, and Spore, Gears is just a joke.Grodus5

??? Gears 1 = 9.5, GTA = 10 and MGS = 10...how is .5 from those two games make it a joke?

Avatar image for ApocalypseXIVV
ApocalypseXIVV

1988

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#7 ApocalypseXIVV
Member since 2004 • 1988 Posts

its going to be hard because it has to compete with two 10s...but it has a chance because who says it wont get a 10 as well. I dont think it will because the story will probably leave something to be desired..but the first one was my favorite MP game this gen and still is...

as for the graphics...you know the graphics still have time to be improved right? you make it sound like they are cutting and pasting the first games graphics into the 2nd...so far the videos of gears 2 looks on par with most of the games out now...so i dont think graphics will be a factor...it will need a better story and have to try to do new things the 1st one didnt to avoid the "we have done this before" curse

Avatar image for ApocalypseXIVV
ApocalypseXIVV

1988

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#8 ApocalypseXIVV
Member since 2004 • 1988 Posts
[QUOTE="GARRYTH"]

well i think every game ever made in this world all have a love/hate thing going. either you hate it or not.

i have played mgs 4 for an hour so far and i great. i beat 1 and 2 but by the time mgs 3 i moved on to other games i was interested in like prince of persia, shadow of the collossis ect. i wish i got to play it but o well.

DeathScape666

If all games were either love it or hate it, then we would have no reason for the following scores: 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8. I thought Luigi's Mansion, for example, was a 5 out of 10. It was fun, but I could do without it. I don't love it or hate it.

yea i was going to say the same thing, i dont think there are many games that i either love or hate...it only seems like that cause this is SW and fanboys love/hate games depending on what system they own...but most games i either enjoy or feel mixed about...as for the topic...ive only played about an hour or so, but so far i love the cut-scenes and the gameplay itself is meh to me...but ive always felt that way about the MGS series

Avatar image for ApocalypseXIVV
ApocalypseXIVV

1988

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#9 ApocalypseXIVV
Member since 2004 • 1988 Posts
[QUOTE="PRKiNG45"][QUOTE="Andrew_Xavier"]

[QUOTE="CAlNlAC"]Wait what? If an A- is 85% what is a B+? 80%? Yeah.. doesn't make much sense to me.-GhostMLD-

Well, here's a standard north american grading scale:

  • A = 80 or higher
  • B = 70–79
  • C = 60–69
  • D = 50–59
  • F = 0–49
Hense why I thought A- would be an 80, but, gamerankings lists A- as 85. *shrugs*

In New York A is 90-94, A+ being 95-99, B being an 80-84 with B+ being 85-89 and so on.

thats clearly not right.

the above makes much more sense and is more widely adopted.

that is not the standard north american grading scale..thats just a lie...in the northeast its this

A=90 or higher

B=80-89

C=70-79

D=65-69

F=0-64

If you get a 50 on a test and your school gives you a D and not a failing grade...you have some pretty low standards in your school..

Avatar image for ApocalypseXIVV
ApocalypseXIVV

1988

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#10 ApocalypseXIVV
Member since 2004 • 1988 Posts

[QUOTE="CAlNlAC"]Wait what? If an A- is 85% what is a B+? 80%? Yeah.. doesn't make much sense to me.user_nat
How does that not make sense?

because every school in the US antyhing with an A in it A-, A, A+ means 90% or above (A-=90-92, A=93-96, A+=97-100)