This should be interesting
Apollo-XI's forum posts
I think I will continue to wait to get a 3DS till a Pokemon game releases for it. That or when they release an improved 3DS with a better battery.
As far as the colors, the only ones I like for the 3DS (including the new purple) are black and red. They need white.
From around Detroit, yet you think Ford got a bailout? :lol: Ford made good decisions in the few years before the the recession started (Fords "restructuring plan"). Had they not, they could have very well been in the same boat with GM and Chrysler.I'm from around Detroit, and I can tell the bailouts have helped immensly with getting Ford, GM, and especially Chrysler back on their feet. YoshiYogurt
faith is the foundation of all religions. regardless of proof, there is a sense of an upper being because of faith. but is faith real? how come some people have faith and some people do not have faith? is it an actual "thing"? is it tangible like matter and objects or is it just something fundamental to religion, but not really "there" like time, measurements, ideas, etc. is faith a fact? is faith something real? or is faith something more for us to question since we all do not have this faith trait even though we're mostly 99.9% the same? is faith the remaining part of that percent? is 1=.999...?ZumaJones07
![-](http://i0.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/000/085/283/philosoraptor.jpg?1291090164)
[QUOTE="michael_1234576"]I'm with you TC, death to the jokers!Michael0134567You want to die?
![-](http://www.dailyhaha.com/_pics/y_so_srs.jpg)
Wow, I loled :DDrakes, what is this?dave123321
[QUOTE="RushKing"]And people still think Obama is socialist. :lol:Rikusaki
What's ironic is that the republicans are against this. Seems like they are against anything Obama does, no matter what it is.
Happens with both parties. Democrats opposes Republican President, Republicans opposes Democratic President. The partisanship has really gotten worse over the past 10 years or so.[QUOTE="Apollo-XI"]Nobody in the Space industry has suggested a Moon colony. It will likely be several years before an advance energy source like nuclear fusion is used on rockets. In the meantime, we should continue to make strides in space exploration and discovery with the technology that we have. Just because we don't have excellent means of travel, doesn't mean we should throw in the towel for exploration. They didn't use steam boats when the America's were discovered, but it didn't stop them from searching for new horizons. I am sorry but what? Comparing the discovery of the Americas to the traveling to Mars is absolutely ridiculous.. Firstly they didn't know the Americas existed from the European perspective.. We can see Mars in the sky, it is not some unknown.. The problem is the distance is far vaster then anything known to man.. It is a waste of time to do it on current technology.. And no where did I say that we are throwing in the tower of exploration.. We have been doing unmanned exploration for decades now.. That seemed defeatist to me. I interpreted that differently I suppose.[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]Until we are able to master something like nuclear fusion to provide us a cheap and infinite energy source (well almost..) space travel is pointless.. The closest body that we can actually reach, the moon, is extremely hazardous to live at for a multitude of reasons.. Namely lack of magnetic field to deflect radiation the sun can produce.. Meaning a nasty solar flare could kill every one on the moon.. And secondly the gravity is too low, people would have extreme health issues given enough time if they lived there.. Places like Mars with current fuel technology is too far away.. Until we finally master a vaste and renewable energy technology to make such distances meaningless when it comes to resource costs, its pointless to discuss.sSubZerOo
[QUOTE="Apollo-XI"]Nobody in the Space industry has suggested a Moon colony. It will likely be several years before an advance energy source like nuclear fusion is used on rockets. In the meantime, we should continue to make strides in space exploration and discovery with the technology that we have. Just because we don't have excellent means of travel, doesn't mean we should throw in the towel for exploration. They didn't use steam boats when the America's were discovered, but it didn't stop them from searching for new horizons. Agreed. Also, we have current tech that would allow travel to and a building of a base on Mars, but the trip there would take around 4 months, so the stay there would have to either be a really long time to make it worth it, or a permanent stay Carrying the equipment for a base on top of all the fuel, food, and water for the crew would certainly make it a pricey mission. I would be concern with the psychological effects of such a long space mission on the crew. We really haven't had tests for the psychological effects of long missions. iirc, Elon Musk wants SpaceX to have a manned mission to Mars in the next decade. NASA has plans for the 2030's. Regardless, someone will get there. I wouldn't count the Chinese out. They could get there first.[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]Until we are able to master something like nuclear fusion to provide us a cheap and infinite energy source (well almost..) space travel is pointless.. The closest body that we can actually reach, the moon, is extremely hazardous to live at for a multitude of reasons.. Namely lack of magnetic field to deflect radiation the sun can produce.. Meaning a nasty solar flare could kill every one on the moon.. And secondly the gravity is too low, people would have extreme health issues given enough time if they lived there.. Places like Mars with current fuel technology is too far away.. Until we finally master a vaste and renewable energy technology to make such distances meaningless when it comes to resource costs, its pointless to discuss.wis3boi
I suspect the first Human's on Mars will land near the North or South Pole to use the ice.
Until we are able to master something like nuclear fusion to provide us a cheap and infinite energy source (well almost..) space travel is pointless.. The closest body that we can actually reach, the moon, is extremely hazardous to live at for a multitude of reasons.. Namely lack of magnetic field to deflect radiation the sun can produce.. Meaning a nasty solar flare could kill every one on the moon.. And secondly the gravity is too low, people would have extreme health issues given enough time if they lived there.. Places like Mars with current fuel technology is too far away.. Until we finally master a vaste and renewable energy technology to make such distances meaningless when it comes to resource costs, its pointless to discuss.sSubZerOoNobody in the Space industry has suggested a Moon colony. It will likely be several years before an advance energy source like nuclear fusion is used on rockets. In the meantime, we should continue to make strides in space exploration and discovery with the technology that we have. Just because we don't have excellent means of travel, doesn't mean we should throw in the towel for exploration. They didn't use steam boats when the America's were discovered, but it didn't stop them from searching for new horizons.
Log in to comment