Auronvolgar's comments

Avatar image for Auronvolgar
Auronvolgar

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

7

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Έπρεπε να το ονομάσουν Hellas.....

Avatar image for Auronvolgar
Auronvolgar

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

7

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

@Hurvl firstly the Infnity was a false name, second they named it xbox 360 only for marketing, because if they named it xbox 2 it would be sound less better than PS3, so now that PS4 will be out, probably they will name it (if they name it again with numbers) Xbox 4xx, instead of those idiots (reporters) that call it again and again Xbox 720

Avatar image for Auronvolgar
Auronvolgar

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

7

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

@JLabeach think it again, and again until you realize that will not going to happend

Avatar image for Auronvolgar
Auronvolgar

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

7

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

@Duninn2013 actualy 460 dollars

Avatar image for Auronvolgar
Auronvolgar

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

7

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Edited By Auronvolgar

@Kryptonbornson @Auronvolgar @abHS4L88 woot? where did you read that? It's UE 4 that runs on GTX 680, not UE3. Obviously they did a good job in the programming of graphics engine. As EA did a good job with Frostbite 2, while having better graphics than most of the games having less system requarments when you max all hte graphics than other games(see diablo 3, Starwars old republic, and much more).
P.S. sorry for bad english.

Avatar image for Auronvolgar
Auronvolgar

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

7

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Edited By Auronvolgar

@xsonicchaos @Imperiacommando @Zeeksie what if I tell you that.... cutscene are made from ingame graphics..... jesus so many experts those days

Avatar image for Auronvolgar
Auronvolgar

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

7

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

@abHS4L88 + I dont think that we all have triple SLI GTX 580 to run those graphics. At GDC 2011, Epic Games stunned the crowd with the Unreal Engine 3 “Samaritan” demo, which offered industry members their first look at the next generation of videogame graphics. Running on three GeForce GTX 580s, the Samaritan demo introduced the world to dynamic facial tessellation, point light reflections, bokeh depth of field, subsurface scattering, and several other highly advanced techniques.

Avatar image for Auronvolgar
Auronvolgar

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

7

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Edited By Auronvolgar

@jayd02 @Auronvolgar They spend money there cuz they want TO SELL THEIR NEW ENGINE...... jesus, Epic is a game company do you realy beleive that they do all this cuz they want you to be happy or something? they just want money, and if they DON'T promote their new GE their is not going to be more money so no more games! you are a cash machine for them, nothing more, they didn't saw that for you, but for companies!!!!!!

Avatar image for Auronvolgar
Auronvolgar

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

7

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

@abHS4L88 ....... eeer man, the Samaritan demo is released on 2011, it's not from Unreal Engine 3 v1.0 and their are not many game companies any more that use that graphic engine for you to see those graphics! + Unreal Engine 3 it's an old Graphic engine and it's very deficult for the programmers to use it on Full Power, and that's the difference with UE 4, Tim Sweeney said that on UE4 the programming will be much easier that the olders Graphic Engines(and he was not speaking only for UE3, but for GE from deferent companies)

Avatar image for Auronvolgar
Auronvolgar

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

7

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

@jayd02 guess what?!?! their is a different team in Epic company that deals with games, and different that deals with graphic engine and video. I know that, I just destroyed your world but it's true