BLUBBBER's forum posts

Avatar image for BLUBBBER
BLUBBBER

367

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 BLUBBBER
Member since 2006 • 367 Posts

I hope your just recommending the game, not advertising. On topic: The game is great, I enjoyed it thoroughly (especially the humour)

Avatar image for BLUBBBER
BLUBBBER

367

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 BLUBBBER
Member since 2006 • 367 Posts

[QUOTE="BLUBBBER"]

If it's Fallout 4 or a new IP, I will kill myself. The wait for a proper sequel to Morrowind has been long enough

-wildflower-

Not nearly as long as some of us have been waiting for a "proper" sequel to Fallout 1 & 2. :shock:

Well I don't think you should wait for Bethesda to develop it, because it will most definitely not turn out like the first 2 games

Avatar image for BLUBBBER
BLUBBBER

367

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 BLUBBBER
Member since 2006 • 367 Posts

If it's Fallout 4 or a new IP, I will kill myself. The wait for a proper sequel to Morrowind has been long enough

Avatar image for BLUBBBER
BLUBBBER

367

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 BLUBBBER
Member since 2006 • 367 Posts

I know there are many arguments about Morrowind vs Oblivion in the past, and I don't want to bring it up again. I agree it does not deserve 100% or even 85-90% just by itself, however I think you guys should give it another chance with mods, such as the highly appraised Oscuro's Oblivion Overhaul. This mod, among many others, really help immersify you into the game, bringing back some of the mechanics from Morrowind. With mods I believe the game is well worth even $60, as I myself have spent well over 300 hours in it.

Avatar image for BLUBBBER
BLUBBBER

367

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 BLUBBBER
Member since 2006 • 367 Posts

Nice, except for Oblivion.rmfd341

:o

Avatar image for BLUBBBER
BLUBBBER

367

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 BLUBBBER
Member since 2006 • 367 Posts

[QUOTE="BLUBBBER"]

[QUOTE="simardbrad"]

I have AMD Phenom II 720 BE Triple Core, ATI Radeon HD 4850 1 GB, 4 gb ddr2 RAM. My computer isn't really great, but I can run Crysis at a pretty decent level. Arma II gets pretty laggy for me, plus the HDR is pretty bad IMO

simardbrad

Add me to xfire - GossamerSolid and I'll help you get it running nice.

Get Battlefield: Bad Company 2, Arma 2 have bugs and glitchesguildclaws

Yes arma 2 does have bugs and glitches... but BC2 does as well. No game will ever be without bugs and glitches due to the fact that they are programmed by a large group of humans. We all make mistakes and it happens in programming. At least ArmA2's devs are always working on fixing problems (http://forums.bistudio.com/forumdisplay.php?f=82) While DICE always says... oh we had distribution problems, let's delay this patch by 2 months.

Sorry for the late reply. I'll add you to xfire

Avatar image for BLUBBBER
BLUBBBER

367

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 BLUBBBER
Member since 2006 • 367 Posts

[QUOTE="BLUBBBER"]

[QUOTE="simardbrad"]

Why do people keep saying Fun - BC2, Realistic - ArmA 2

Personally I find the realism in ArmA 2 way more "fun" than BC2. It's more like this:

Arcade - BC2

Realistic - ArmA 2

simardbrad

Honestly after I played Operation Arrowhead's demo today, I enjoyed it much more than BF:BC2 because of it's deep tactical, sandbox experience. However, the game runs horribly so I can't play it well

What are your pc specs?

I have AMD Phenom II 720 BE Triple Core, ATI Radeon HD 4850 1 GB, 4 gb ddr2 RAM. My computer isn't really great, but I can run Crysis at a pretty decent level. Arma II gets pretty laggy for me, plus the HDR is pretty bad IMO

Avatar image for BLUBBBER
BLUBBBER

367

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 BLUBBBER
Member since 2006 • 367 Posts

Why do people keep saying Fun - BC2, Realistic - ArmA 2

Personally I find the realism in ArmA 2 way more "fun" than BC2. It's more like this:

Arcade - BC2

Realistic - ArmA 2

simardbrad

Honestly after I played Operation Arrowhead's demo today, I enjoyed it much more than BF:BC2 because of it's deep tactical, sandbox experience. However, the game runs horribly so I can't play it well

Avatar image for BLUBBBER
BLUBBBER

367

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 BLUBBBER
Member since 2006 • 367 Posts

Based on your scale, HL2 would be a bit above average based on all the revolutionary games that have come out on PC, such as Doom and Diablo. In all seriousness Crysis is below average. Maybe if they actually had an interesting plot line and revolutionary gameplay, then it would fit some place in the timeline

Avatar image for BLUBBBER
BLUBBBER

367

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 BLUBBBER
Member since 2006 • 367 Posts

I've been looking at Bad Company 2 for a while now, and today when I checked it's $30. Is the community still popular and is the game worth it still?