Well, national television (NRK)announced that Eurovision would be broadcasted in 3D so everyone had to buy glasses.
Kinda funny. Atleast it was a large scale prank.
Othervise... Nothing, no pranks from friends, no pranks from relatives, nothing...
Backbonesalsa's forum posts
Sony and MS are both getting motion contols. In my opinion, the PS3 is better than the Wii in ALL areas, including motion controls, so the Wii cannot use motion controls as a trump card anymore. Lets compare the PS3 and Wii side-by-side in various aspects:
-Hardware: The PS3 has HD graphics, Blu-ray, 250gb hard drive, and has multimedia features to take advantage of it. As for the Wii, it is essentially an upgraded Gamecube with 512mb Flash. Is Nintendo actually serious about selling a console with 512mb flash even though its 2010 and we have mobile phones with 32gb memory?
-Online: The PS3 has better online by a long shot, and no annoying friends codes to worry about. You can download all kinds of stuff from PSN, and the DRM is not harsh like Nintendo's DRM on DSiWare games.
-Motion controls: Sony has shown that their motion controls are great for hardcore AND casual games. This is because the PS Move is more accurate and responsive. Hardcore gamers require responsive controls so they know they are relying on their skills, rather than because they were lucky that the controls managed to work okay. Wiimote is good too (especially with MotionPlus), but its still not as good as the PS Move. Oh, and the use of a camera is great with the Move.
-Games: Okay, I understand this is more of an opinion-related topic, but lets get serious: it would be difficult to argue that the Wii has better games than PS3. Take a look at a Wii games shelf and try telling me its better than the PS3 shelf. Oh sure, theres a handful of good Mario/Zelda/Metroid game, but apart from that, its really dfficult to say the Wii has good games. As for the PS3, you have loads of good games, both exclusives AND multiplats. You won't be seeing BioShock, Fallout, Darksiders, Tekken 6 and loads more on the Wii.
Since the PS3 is now officially better than the Wii in all areas, I guess the only reason why the Wii is still winning is because of Nintendo's marketing, plus the lower price. But the PS3 is no longer expensive anymore, and the Gamecube along with the Dreamcast have proved than lower price does not always guarantee victory in console wars. So what else is making the Wii sell so much? Is it because of Nintendo's brandname? Or is it because people like paying for obsolete technology as long as 0.1% of the games are good?
PandaBear86
Look, while you can, by all universal means, state your opinion, i don't thinkit's not rigth to act like it is the one and only truth.
I am one of those who give my Wii regular love, and i think it is far better than PS3 and XBOX360, yet i am discret enough to realize that my point of wiew is an opinion, not a fact. You should pay this a thougth.
If Adventures isn't a Starfox game, its title is highly misleading. It is a Stafox game, despite not being exactly the same as Starfox 64. It was different in the best way possible, in my opinion.[QUOTE="Litchie"]
[QUOTE="kenakuma"]
Because it wasnt :?
kenakuma
http://www.zentendo.com/reviews.php?articleId=373&page=1
Its as much a starfox game as say halo 3 would be considered a mario game if at the last minute in development they slapped mario in the title and replaced master cheifs character model with mario's :?
Thats basically what Nintendo did to Rare's Dinasour Planet (true name of the game) and all its characters!
These a reason SFA plays and feels nothing like a star fox game and thats because it never truly was...
And still i love it so much...
Now on topic;I would also think that the idea of making a Starfox fps would have been interesting. Though i would prefer a 3rd person one... although that attempt (SF Assault) did not go very well. Perhaps an option of switching between 1st and 3rd person could work? Star wars Battlefront did a decent job at that.
I demand to know why NRK have not paid this catastrophe of apocalyptic proposions a single thougth. Is Arne Hellingsen and Stoltenberg just sitting there, reporting about Chile when a catastrophe is coming? ... Now even 1,26 microseconds earlier? What, 2012? No, i'm speaking about my math exam.
But seriously; I don't really see what this has so much to do with 2012. You can draw signs from just about anything and find them to be pointing towards an upcoming catastrophe.
who misses Bush? I do...Anti-Venom
Yes... It's a shame he did not pass that constitutional-bending idea of letting him sit another four years:P
Sigh... I've heard similiar things a dozen times before. Fredrik... don't make a fool out of yourself. You're already an EX dice developer.
Log in to comment