[QUOTE="spiderluck"][QUOTE="BattlefieldFan1"][QUOTE="Miketheman83"] So people didnt play it but they like it more? Now I get it. Lol Well, maybe I can let your xbot friends do the talking for me. http://www.metacritic.com/game/xbox-360/gears-of-war-3 User score: 7.5 LOL... Yup, gears of war was sold on hype. Outside of that, it's a mediocre game and not even your kind likes it. You're on gamespot numbnuts...gears of war 9.5...deal with it AHAHAHAHAHA... Yup, the xbot insults that ps3 fanboys use does make a lot of sense. You need a biased game rater to tell you what games you can enjoy? LOL... You're a joke man. I bet you also think P2P is better than dedicated servers because microsoft told you so, huh? Good thing there are still some 360 owners with sense and gave the mediocre game gears the score it deserves: a 7.5.
[QUOTE="spiderluck"][QUOTE="BattlefieldFan1"][QUOTE="Miketheman83"] How is something more popular, yet it sold less? That makes no sense whatsoever. I can understand lems have poor logic, so I'll forgive you this time and explain it again. You guys have a lot of money lying around because there are no exclusive games for the 360. So if any mediocre garbage comes out, you go out in droves to buy it. The PS3 users already bought a lot of exclusives before U3 came out, and thus a lot of them don't have a lot of cash laying around to spend. Just how expensive are these ps3 exclusives ...360 DOMINATES software sales all around...are we to believe that ps3 exclusives are so expensive that ps3 fans can only afford a few Wrong, dumbass. http://www.gameinformer.com/b/news/archive/2011/09/07/sony-xbox-360-has-more-units-but-software-sells-on-ps3.aspx And the more units is probably because of the RROD fiasco.
[QUOTE="meetroid8"][QUOTE="BattlefieldFan1"][QUOTE="Miketheman83"] How is something more popular, yet it sold less? That makes no sense whatsoever. I can understand lems have poor logic, so I'll forgive you this time and explain it again. You guys have a lot of money lying around because there are no exclusive games for the 360. So if any mediocre garbage comes out, you go out in droves to buy it. The PS3 users already bought a lot of exclusives before U3 came out, and thus a lot of them don't have a lot of cash laying around to spend. Just because there are no exclusives doesn't mean that there are no games. 360 has all of the same multiplats as PS3, many of which actually sold better on the 360. Not as many people bought U3 because not as many people are fans of the series, if they spent their money knowing that they wouldn't have the money to buy U3 then they must not care all that much about it. Yup, and the ps3 has all the multiplats the 360 had AND the exclusives. My point still stands. Well, I just hope the "fans" are still fans after playing that garbage they call a game with an average user score of 7.5.
[QUOTE="Miketheman83"][QUOTE="BattlefieldFan1"][QUOTE="Miketheman83"] How is something more popular, yet it sold less? That makes no sense whatsoever. I can understand lems have poor logic, so I'll forgive you this time and explain it again. You guys have a lot of money lying around because there are no exclusive games for the 360. So if any mediocre garbage comes out, you go out in droves to buy it. The PS3 users already bought a lot of exclusives before U3 came out, and thus a lot of them don't have a lot of cash laying around to spend. So people didnt play it but they like it more? Now I get it. Lol Well, maybe I can let your xbot friends do the talking for me. http://www.metacritic.com/game/xbox-360/gears-of-war-3 User score: 7.5 LOL... Yup, gears of war was sold on hype. Outside of that, it's a mediocre game and not even your kind likes it.
[QUOTE="Miketheman83"][QUOTE="BattlefieldFan1"][QUOTE="meetroid8"] If they U3 was more popular than Gears 3 it would have sold more. But it didn't, so it must not be. If all the other PS3 exclusives didn't sell well and Uncharted 3 came out on the first half of the year, that would make sense. But facts say these didn't happen, as 2011 PS3 exclusives sold well and U3 came out on the latter-half of the year. How is something more popular, yet it sold less? That makes no sense whatsoever. I can understand lems have poor logic, so I'll forgive you this time and explain it again. You guys have a lot of money lying around because there are no exclusive games for the 360. So if any mediocre garbage comes out, you go out in droves to buy it. The PS3 users already bought a lot of exclusives before U3 came out, and thus a lot of them don't have a lot of cash laying around to spend.
Let's assume microsoft wins next gen and Sony and Nintendo start charging for their online services. Do you think companies like Activision and EA will start charging to play on their multiplayer games? After all, microsoft taught the other companies that you can get away with charging to play on an inferior, laggy P2P service by calling it superior to your competitor's.
[QUOTE="meetroid8"][QUOTE="BattlefieldFan1"][QUOTE="meetroid8"] Or maybe U3 just isn't as popular as some 360 exclusives? Possible, but highly unlikely. Do you think the average PS3 user has $500 every year to spend on all the exclusives? Think. If they U3 was more popular than Gears 3 it would have sold more. But it didn't, so it must not be. If all the other PS3 exclusives didn't sell well and Uncharted 3 came out on the first half of the year, that would make sense. But facts say these didn't happen, as 2011 PS3 exclusives sold well and U3 came out on the latter-half of the year.
[QUOTE="BattlefieldFan1"][QUOTE="Chrome-"]Wow....U3 didn't even make the top 10 last year that's pretty disappointing.meetroid8
It was expected. Ps3 users buy multiple exclusives. They have a choice. 360 owners don't have anything else to buy, so they buy whatever is available. Or maybe U3 just isn't as popular as some 360 exclusives? Possible, but highly unlikely. Do you think the average PS3 user has $500 every year to spend on all the exclusives? Think.
I have a PS3 and a wii. It's not that I love those 2 consoles that I would cut my nutsack off for them. It's about microsoft's **** pay2play on laggy P2P network policy. If microsoft ends up winning, you can expect to buy far far fewer games in the near future. You think other companies aren't looking closely at microsoft's model? Pretty soon, you're gonna have to start paying monthly fees for ALL your games including the $60 yearly fee for LIVE. Thanks lems, you ruined it for the true gamers because your fanboyism blinded you from microsoft's 9-inch phallus pounding your rear-end.
Log in to comment