First of all, do not come here complaining.I don't want to start a flame war.If you do want, i have a simple suggestion for you - F * * K O F F ! Second, when you respond, i expect you to have been experiencing both - Nvidia 3D vision and PS3 3D.

Nobody has ever discussed this topic.And i've heard that Sony 3d update is out.So, all i want to know is what is the difference? I know that lots of articles said, how PS3 3D will be limited and so on.How is the quality? How close is the PS3 version to Nvidia 3D?

All i know is, that Nvidia 3d Vision requires no special game specific updates.There is lirerally a hundreds of 3D vision compatible games out there.Only some PS3 games already have 3D right now and even then some of them are just demo versions.

Now, people.If anyone have tested both of these systems, can you tell me the difference.I don't want to know what your expectations or speculations are.I want to know it from people, who have experienced both.

I have a feeling, that most players don't give a rats testicles about storylines in most of the games, most of the time.I have noticed, that most time i don't care a horses furbawl about the story.I either totally ignore it and mind my own bussiness or im just not paying any attention.I can list a handful of games out of dozens and dozens of games, where i actually cared about the story at all. For instance, all these additional notes like telephone messages in Fear, or notes in many other games - i often just totally ignore them.In Bad Company 2 i was at one moment blasting a village, while others tried to explaine situation, haha.Often it feels, that cutscenes are added there just to annoy me.In Half-Life i couön't wait till they are over.I wish i could just skip them by blasting myself trough a wall and GTFO.

To be honest, Homefront seems to have an interesting singleplayer.Which is all i play.If they just added more replay value and stats to singleplayer games these days, they would be even more fun.If you compare KZ2 to Crysis, then Crysis wins in graphics.But KZ2 has better AI and better fight, scripted AI or not.Crysis AI was dumb, the destruction part was fun though.Chop a whole forest down with machinegun, hehe.

They should add this kind of reply value to singleplayer :

http://www.gamespot.com/users/BattleforAzerot/show_blog_entry.php?topic_id=m-100-25829468&tag=all-about%3Bblog3

Let me remind you, that this thread was NOT about PC vs consoles.This thread was about which game trailer was more impressive.Killzone 3 looks pretty good actually, but Crysis 2 looks better.

I don't care either, if there is any religious content in any of the games.After all there is a lot of fantasy and sci-fi elements in many of the games and i don't see the difference between religios superstition and game fantasy.Its after all someones imagination, a someones vision.Games come in many shapes and formats, some include small portion of sci-fi elements, some are full scale fantasy worlds built from ground up and have very little to do with our every day reality.The game worlds are not bound by a laws of physics after all.Which means they don't have to be realistic anyway.Nobody is disdurbed, how they have all sorts of magical spells and spooky ghosts in games.Only anti theists would be annoyed by the fact, that there are religios elements like angels in games.But thats theyr problem.

So what 3 people that we know of have had problems with the new Xbox 360 S and its a huge issue now, you do realise that PS3's and even some Wii's can be defective at purchase ?

Every piece of electronic equipment has a chance to fail, usually the accepted rate is

Snugenz

And the rate is?

I think steam is one of the things, that keeps gaming on PC strong.It has all these cool discounts, like i got Tomb Raider Underworld for 5€ and Ghostbusters for 4€.I mostly only buy games during a discounts.

And some people think, that you need to upgrade your PC every year.BS.My friend has hes PC like for 3rd year, no upgrades and still runs games like a charm.No need to max out settings, this is more of an obsession than actual need.Most games on medium or high look just fine, you don't absolutely have to run them on ultrahigh settings.

One of the developers, that has'nt gone to console market is a Blizzard Entertainment.Though they did say, that console version of Diablo 3 is possibility.

I have no problems either, i got some lag sometimes.But most of us have some lag sometimes.

I haven't bought a single map pack for CoD.Mainly because i can't stand dying so otfen on multiplayer.Its not like you get 10/1 K/D ratio every single time you play.But yet, that would be like only way, to have fun for me.I just hate to die so often.It ruins the game anyway.

Here is my top list in hours each.I only added the games that are 100+ hours or almost 100 hours.

482 - Torchlight

126 - Modern Warfare 2 (singleplayer and Spec Ops, only 2 hours on multiplayer)

148 - World At War (singleplayer , like random missions and coop mostly, i only played zombie mode few times)

134 - Crysis (mostly custom maps)

130 - Half-Life 2

185 - Stalker : Call of Pripyat

96 - Stalker : Shadow of Chernobyl

96 - Company of Heroes : Tales of Valor (watched replies most of the time)

119 - Just Cause 2

211 - Half-Life (Mostly Svencoop mod)