Torchlight , Modern Warfare 2 (play spec ops alone from time to time) , Quake/2 , Call of Pripyat, Just Cause 2 and some other games that i play randomly and like 20 min - hour for one day and then next time 2 months latter another hour.

According to Ray Kurzweil , its a year.It takes a year according to him.

Prince of Persia in the end of 80s or beginning of 90s.I only played for few minutes , maybe 5 minutes max.It was too hard for me.Actually i played some other game before that , but i can't remember the name.It had checkpoints in it and you had to pick up crystals and you could trade them.And then buy stuff.It was 2D platform game from side view.

The MW2 spec ops always had an "estimated time" for each mission.I almost always spent 5-10 times more than that estimation was.I never rushed , i always cleared out all areas before moving on.I like to take things in a slow pace.Hell , i played Far Cry 2 over a 200+ hours and still haven't quiet finished the game.If i like the game and if its possible , i will most likely spend 100+ hours on same game without ever starting a new one.

Everyone talking about the new DX11 cards and new core processors and so on.But think about this , console (PS3 , XBOX 360) are equivalent to 7900GT series.The proccessor is 5 years old.Computing power doubles every year.By that sheer logic , gaming rigs should be like 32 times faster.But when it comes to gaming , if you compare one game like GTA 4 or Just Cause 2 to PC , it seems that PC only has some little fancy extra elements in it.Nothing more.And it runs 40-60 FPS on a 5800 series , like someone commented on the steam forums for JC2 ? Shoul'nt it run like 350-500 FPS ? But now , a computer equal to console in computing power somehow can't run some of the latest cross platform games.For some magical reasons , PC needs like 5 or 10 calculations for every calculation console does.

I mean if they really optimized something on modern PC , woul'nt it make a open world game with fully DMM destructible environment , extremely organized AI and simulated liquids.Yea , i know its all about the market and sh*t , but... And don't tell me how having a 10 times computer doesn't allow you to run 10 times more stuff in it , because if not so you should be able to "optimize" Crysis to PS1 and only get slight downgrade in graphics.And the truth is that DMM is nowhere near of being deployed in a full scale.

I don't want any ranting in here , but they say how consoles will last to 2015 and so on.But by that time , a hand held device is seriously competing with the 360/PS3.You will be able to run Far Cry 2 on an IPod.A hand held device industry will take over from consoles , thats an interesting...

Personally i hate the walktrough nature of a FPS games.The environment always has to change by the seconds.Clear out one spot , move on , clear out another one , move on , clear out another area , move on.Thats it... for the most part of a game.I would like to see how its possible to implement "static battle" into a FPS shooters ;) At least i would like to see it , i dont know about others.And it would need to have stats in it , like kills and so on.

Me in other hand wants a lot of swearing , drinking and violence.A nice action FPS based around hardcore action , free play would rock.Just to last for 200+ hours , so i can blow living **** out of a commies for next 2 months.and a lots of statistics to know exactly how many shots and hits and kills with each weapon i have made.

You said "villains" , not "villain".

So here they are

bandits - stalker

monoliths - stalker

locust horde - gears of war (not gears of war 2)

0$

And i rather not play any walktrough FPS either.Had enough with Call of Duty blitzkrieg mode , which the gameplay basically is in singleplayer.