[QUOTE="killtactics"][QUOTE="Sully28"][QUOTE="Baurus_1"]

[QUOTE="pro-nathan-07"]just a shame the 360 has both awesome graphics and brilliant games, where as the ps3 is just bells and whistlesluckystar23

PS3 has great games too.....AND exclusives will BETTER GRAPHICS.

AMEN. Il take uncharted over gears, ratchet and clank over mass effect, warhawk over halo 3 any day.

It takes some pretty hardcore devotion to enjoy the ps3's lineup more than the 360's at this point.

Guess you've never played the PS3 or it's exclusive games.

graphically? kameo. I've played both.carsales

LOL!!!!!!!

Yes. A game that had a long development cycle that initially started on the N64, then went to the Gamecube, then went to the Xbox, and then was rsuhed out to meet the launch of the 360 is totally indicative of the console's hardware prowess compared to a game on a different platform that was developed in mind for that specific console.

ZeldaMaster32

excuses........excuses..........

Uncharted vs. the 2006 GOTY???

You serious???

Riverwolf007

Other than the Berserker missions, Gears single player is absolute garbage.

Now which do you think is the more powerful system with better graphics? LOL!!

Ratchet beats Kameo in graphics bigtime!!

just a shame the 360 has both awesome graphics and brilliant games, where as the ps3 is just bells and whistlespro-nathan-07

PS3 has great games too.....AND exclusives will BETTER GRAPHICS.

halo 3 and bioshock single player... and SMG single player >>>> uncharted single player. at least i think socrunchUK

Halo 3 is not even in the same league.

Bioshock is great, that's true.

SMG (and most Wii games) are made for little children.

okay...does is offer the coop experience that Gears did? no...see what i did there?clone01

I said single player. Co-op is still considered multiplayer.