[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]It was a question.....that said....if you mowed one hundred yards in one day....and 15 didn't pay you...would you want compensation for what is legally yours? Yes or no?LJS9502_basic
Yeah, but I'd try to go through the civil courts for damages (breach of contract, implied, verbal, written, etc. They're employing me) firstly and not the criminal courts for theft of services.
I don't think theft of services would work with piracy either.
Okay. So you agree that someone not compensating your for what you are legally entitled to would be wrong. Copyrights are legal protections under the law as to remuneration. How do you use a double standard to justify piracy then? Both cases are only legal in nature.
This seems to be a logical solution. Just think of what civilisation could achieve with going back to basics after 90% of this shoddy, sheepish world is gone.
[QUOTE="Bitter_Altmer"][QUOTE="MushroomWig"] Where did you get this information you thick? IRA didn't set out to hurt civilians .Research is healthy kid. The IRA were freedom fighters.xTheExploited
Pay no attention to him, clearly he's been brain washed by every single government to think that anyone who fights for their countrys freedom are nothing but cold blooded terrorists.
Thank you Fox news. -__-
The IRA are murderers. Ireland has been independent since 1922 so the IRA are no longer freedom fighters, they are terrorists.
Also, to adress this quote, the IRA of the Troubles in the 70's are vastly different to Collins' IRA of the war for independance before 1922, they are not the same.
The IRA are murderers. Ireland has been independent since 1922 so the IRA are no longer freedom fighters, they are terrorists.xTheExploited
News flash: The north of Ireland isn't, and there is a whole lot of nationalists living up there too. They're freedom fighters, fighting to have a united Ireland. News flash, Northern Ireland doesn't want to become independent. If the people of Northern Ireland wanted to then they could in an instant but they don't. The majority opinion in Northern Ireland is that they want to remain British so no, the IRA are not freedom fighters. They are trying to fight for the "freedom" of a country that does not want their help. That is because the majoriy are Unionists, and guess what that means? Yeah, they want to be part of Britain and consider themselves British. Having said that, there is a huge chunk of nationalists that would like to see a united Ireland and while living in the north, consider themselves Irish. And you're wrong by saying that even if there was a majority that they could become independant in an instant, you are actually prepared to tell me here and now that Westminster would let the north go just like that, just because nationalists wanted to?
[QUOTE="Bitter_Altmer"][QUOTE="MushroomWig"] Where did you get this information you thick? IRA didn't set out to hurt civilians .Research is healthy kid. The IRA were freedom fighters.xTheExploited
Pay no attention to him, clearly he's been brain washed by every single government to think that anyone who fights for their countrys freedom are nothing but cold blooded terrorists.
Thank you Fox news. -__-
The IRA are murderers. Ireland has been independent since 1922 so the IRA are no longer freedom fighters, they are terrorists. News flash: The north of Ireland isn't, and there is a whole lot of nationalists living up there too. They're freedom fighters, fighting to have a united Ireland.
Log in to comment