@Serpentes420 Rage was good but it was only half a game and most of the team who made it where laid off if I remeber correctly so I dont think it made money. Thou your right the rest of those did really well.
If you made a great FPS with a Great story and heres the main kicker a Campaign that takes longer then 5-10hrs to beat I have a feeling you would make whatever money you put into the project back. Look at Fallout 3 its not just a FPS its a RPG mind you its buggy as hell on the PS3 after 20hrs of play and even more so with the dlc. But it was a great game. And it made out well enough for Bethesda to release Fallout New Vegas which was even more buggy then Fallout 3 and they did well on that as well to release an possible Online fallout which if it comes to the PS3 I plan to stay the hell away from it.
Rage was a great game but by the end of it I felt like I only played half a game and I did everything in about 25hrs. No replay value ethier.
And how many great games have been ruined by EA, Command and Conquer was a great game before EA touched it and so was Dragon Age, The seconed one was ruined. Hell even Mass Effect was great and still is in most regards but the End Kinda sucked. And the day one DLC didnt help matter much with that one. You really have to weigh the pros and cons, I see more cons then Pros at the moment.
@jubdeidamasta Well Activison dosent know how to make a good Star Trek game. And I thought Prototype 2 was far to easy and short. And there movie based games suck.
And if you every played a movie based game alot of them come from EA and they just suck. Thou they really suck regardless if EA makes them or someone else.
Hes not far off EA does make some good games but the ruined more then one game series. EA was the worst thing to happen to Command and Conquer the last one was just horrible. It was a far better game series when Westwood was making them.
Briantb_2008's comments