What, in fact, was the purpose of your post?How is that related to what I posted? Columbus was Christian, he found America, and in turn discovered the world was not in fact Flat (At Least for himself)?
Snipes_2
Burnt_Star's forum posts
[QUOTE="Burnt_Star"][QUOTE="jimmyjammer69"] I'm going to respectfully disagree. I can see how you might call freedom of speech or freedom from undue incarceration civil liberties, but I don't see how the granting of a document with the title "marriage certificate" to whomever wants one is a civil liberty.jimmyjammer69
If two compotent rational adults (regardless of gender) wish to get married I can't think of any logical reason to stop them, land of the free. We shouldn't want anyone to make decisions that limit a persons freedom when it comes to whom they can or can't get married to (pedophilia and incestuous relationships excluded of course).
Why obviously incest? Marriage is 50% tradition, 25% reassurance for offspring (which, luckily, has largely been superceded by paternal/maternal legal status indpendent of marital status) and 25% privileges which shouldn't even exist any more. I can't see any problem with granting whatever useful rights marriage confers to homosexual couples without riling up the traditionalists and religious types by calling all unions 'marriages'.Because incest is a crime. Marriage isn't exclusive to religion, I don't see any harm in allowing gays the same privileges as those who are involved with a religion. If a homosexual couple wants the tile of a married couple instead of a unified one I don't think religions should have any say in the matter simply because they get riled up.
The same thing he literally just wrote.When they disagree with a disrespectful and offensive manner, then yes "homophobe" is the most appropriate title to attribute to them.
What about other people who dissagre in a disrespectful and offensive manner? What do you call them?
alexside1
But I doubt any of the aforementioned groups had any interaction with Colombus.THey never thought you'd fall of the other side and go to hell.
"The popular idea that he was first person to envision a rounded earth is false. The rounded shape of the earth has already been known in ancient times".
"Various cultures have had conceptions of a flat Earth, including ancientBabylon,Ancient Egypt, pre-ClassicalGreeceand pre-17th centuryChina. This view contrasts with the realization first recorded around the 4th century BC bynatural philosophers of Classical Greecethat theEarth is spherical."
CHristians were not the only ones to think the World was Flat.
Snipes_2
Wait wut ? i never saw anyone considering it beautifull. And another thing, a bit off topic, dont you think this gay marriage thing will increase the number of HIV infected?Drakes_FortuneBecause HIV is only exclusive to gays and no one else participating in recreational sex can contract it, you know nothing.
So if murder is all of sudden legally ok, would you be ok that a mother kill her own child? Why your opinion be any different than mine?You can't use murder and gay marriage in an analogy, they're just not relative, I see where you're going with this and I won't entertain it. You and my personal feelings concerning both murder and gay marriage don't dictate its legal stance. If your offended by gay marriage don't participate in one.alexside1
I'm going to respectfully disagree. I can see how you might call freedom of speech or freedom from undue incarceration civil liberties, but I don't see how the granting of a document with the title "marriage certificate" to whomever wants one is a civil liberty.jimmyjammer69
If two compotent rational adults (regardless of gender) wish to get married I can't think of any logical reason to stop them, land of the free. We shouldn't want anyone to make decisions that limit a persons freedom when it comes to whom they can or can't get married to (pedophilia and incestuous relationships excluded of course).
I never said my definition is correct.alexside1There's no correct or proper definition of love, if you admit your definition isn't "the correct one" why do you want to enforce your incorrect views on gays?
The difference is murder is legally wrong, morals are irrelavent. Homosexual marriage on the other hand is a civil liberty, it can't be changed simply because you dislike it. As for the second part can you translate and repeat the question?So denying the mother's right to kill her own child is prejudice? Your reasoning doesn't add up.
Why yours be any different than mine?
alexside1
Log in to comment