yeah, the fact that in-game-music is up to devs is a huge disappointment.

It's not that hard to get this right; give the users freedom. Simple as that.

Play's scores don't say anything about the quality of a game to me, they throw perfect scores all over the place.
I'll keep waiting for a little more credible mag/site to review it before I breathe out.

FPS is just a number. Framerate does not make a good game. gregga86

But low framerate makes a bad game. Tho 30fps isnt low enough to ruin the game really.

...2 ps3 or 1 xbox and 1 ps3 since games is multiplatform anyways...blisken11

Are you sure about that? I've never tried LAN with PS3, but since most multiplat games don't have cross play online, I doubt they'd have it on LAN..

To the OP; you need two copies of the game. Though if I remember correctly, in Warhawk you'll only need one copy of the game, and you'll be able to share it with several other PS3s through LAN.

[QUOTE="Calibah"]Ok, it was a disappointment that there was no split screen, but I still think the game deserves more than 7.9 based on online only. I think it's a blast to race online.

Bioshock is also lacking modes, but based on the logic above it shouldn't get more than 8.5-9.0. (which I disagree with, Bioshock seems like a 9.5-game, and Motorstorm was at least 8.5)c0mplex

different genre's demand different amounts of content. a racing game needs to have various modes, otherwise the gameplay can get repetitive faster than any other genre.

on the other hand... FPS games usually get docked for not having an atmostpheric environment or a storyline to go with it. its not like FPS games should get docked for having various modes of shooting people, nor should racing games get docked for lacking a storyline.

Well, I'm pretty sure multiplayer is expected (or demanded) in a modern FPS game. I don't think that excuse is valid.

whats the point in streaming the video over to youre ps3 it makes no difference at all. why not just watch it off youre pc or burn it to a dvdd_ano