[QUOTE="Canon-Gatorade"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]Government is government. Why are you making a distinction? Anyway if the feds had wanted to they could have changed voting much earlier. Like I said.....federal law supersedes state. Or didn't you understand that the first time? By allowing it...the feds were complicit.LJS9502_basicThe very start of the thread is the federal government, the state governments do not have countrol of the entire country, it's the federal government causing the issues of today not that states. Also all you did was prove my point, they interfered less because that's what was expected from them in exchange for freedom. That's like saying since all people in the world are human, we should get involved in all foreign affairs and if we allow corruption to go on we are complicit.You seem to be ignoring that the feds could have brought the states in line much earlier. \I don't see how you aren't getting it, yes they could have, but they didn't since the whole point is the government to have less control. That's what the countries purpose was.
Canon-Gatorade's forum posts
Log in to comment