[QUOTE="dominer"]
Angry Grandpa is back, ya'll.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k48qU4fxqSg
WhiteKnight77
What an idiot. Tore up his belongings over a stupid trial.
Looking at the channel name I am pretty sure that wasn't serious.
Forum Posts | Following | Followers |
---|---|---|
5288 | 1 | 5 |
[QUOTE="dominer"]
Angry Grandpa is back, ya'll.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k48qU4fxqSg
WhiteKnight77
What an idiot. Tore up his belongings over a stupid trial.
Looking at the channel name I am pretty sure that wasn't serious.
[QUOTE="Bucked20"]
His address is online too,wonder if someone will really kill him
lostrib
is it his actual address or the one spike lee retweeted a while ago?
That was his parents, but CNN aired his address on TV (along with his Social Security number)
People say the case had nothing to do with race need to wake up. Clearly in AmeriKKA the JUST-US system does not work for black people. You think I had guns before if I take my trash out I will be armed. Florida just green lighted cowards to kill blacks if they dare to fight a bigger armed person tracking them in the dead of night.
no-scope-AK47
For the first case that is not even a Florida case, it is in New York, and was an unlicensed pistol. Florida and New York have different laws in that matter. The Second case the woman fired a warning shot (which is stupid and dangerous), and escaped to the garage came back, with the weapon then fired.
[QUOTE="Chaos_HL21"]
[QUOTE="Rattlesnake_8"] Better than shooting them.JordanizPro
No it not, bullets can ricochet. This isn't a video game. When you are defending yourself you fire center mass. Another thing is she escaped to the garage, came back with the gun THEN fired the warning shot.
I get what your saying but this is still **** up considering what GZ didWell they are two differnt stories. 1) She fired a warning shot, and 2) She 'escaped' to the garage, got her firearm, then came back into the house to fire the warning shot.
[QUOTE="Chaos_HL21"]Better than shooting them.1) Firing a WARNING shot is stupid and dangerous.
2) She went into the garage, pushing past her husband, got the gun, then fired.
Rattlesnake_8
No it not, bullets can ricochet. This isn't a video game. When you are defending yourself you fire center mass. Another thing is she escaped to the garage, came back with the gun THEN fired the warning shot.
1) Firing a WARNING shot is stupid and dangerous.
2) She went into the garage, pushing past her husband, got the gun, then fired.
MSNBC airs photo of TM's dead body.
www.mediaite.com/tv/msnbc-accidentally-airs-image-of-trayvon-martins-dead-body-anchor-apologizes-for-awful-mistake/
For just under a second on Thursday afternoon, MSNBC aired a photograph showing Trayvon Martins corpse sprawled out on the grass in Florida, just hours after he was shot and killed by George Zimmerman.
If you were watching the networks coverage of the trial yesterday, you likely missed the split-second mistake. But one Gawker reader caught it; and he submitted it into the website, resulting in a post that has made the rounds on the Internet this afternoon.
The cable networks rely on a pool feed for trials such as this one, and oftentimes it can be difficult to censor images quickly enough so that viewers at home dont see every last detail (or hear every curse word).
That apparently happened yesterday afternoon, as the image of a dead Martin showed up on-screen for under a second, before MSNBCs control room quickly scrambled to use a shot of prosecutor Bernie de la Rionda. Afterwards, it becomes clear the network is unsure what other images may pop up in the pool feed, and so a good ten seconds of the trial is simply blurred to prevent further slips.
FastEddie2121
A similar thing happen with CNN. The prosecutor failed to fully redact Zimmerman's personal infomation on a report. So during it 24 hour coverage of the trail they showed Zimmerman's Social Security Number, and other things.
martin isn't within his rights to attack someone just because he follows him.[QUOTE="Person0"][QUOTE="monkeytoes61"]
Zimmerman shot an unarmed kid walking home from 7/11 with candy to watch a basketball game, even though the cops told him to back off. Sounds like murder to me.
Even if there was a scuffle between the two (which I don't believe there was), Martin was well within his rights to defend himself from some creepy dude following him home.
theone86
So that's where we're drawing the line? Some person you don't know who's twice your size is stalking you and you don't have the right to fight them if you're fearful for your own safety, but you get into a fistfight and start losing you have the right to shoot the other person dead? That seems like a pretty shifty definition of what constitutes self-defense.
Well just because you think someone is stalking you doesn't give you the right to beat the person to death. We do not know if Zimmerman started the fight there is no solid proof to show that.
Log in to comment