@ZeroX91 I actually think the Vita has a lot more "good games" than the 3DS does. It's just that the 3DS has a couple games people obsess over (eg. Fire Emblem).
In the past week, Levine, Double Eleven, and Adam Boyes all had tweets being rather playful with the prospect of Bioshock coming to Vita. I don't think they'd be so overt, especially Boyes, if it wasn't going to happen. Just remember, the same thing happened with used games and online DRM prior to Sony making an official statement. Execs aren't stupid.
@Mugzippit I think you're too quick to give Nintendo a pass. Yes, there are other options for online multiplayer, but PC, PS3/4, and 360/XBO all have games with local multiplayer too. You don't need a Wii/Wii U for local MP. And when you don't have friends over, then what? That's why most Wiis sit unused until there's a party - that's all it's good for, "party games."
@RicanV @WoodenStick To me, lack of replay value doesn't matter if a game has an engaging story the first time around (eg. Remember Me), however, when a game HAS multiplayer then I expect online first and local second, not the other way around. That's what I have a problem with. I shoudn't be forced to invite friends over to my house to enjoy half the game.
@hochstreck @ClayMeow Other reviews have indicated that the main campaign can be finished in less than ten hours. Yes, there is replay through local co-op, but why hasn't Nintendo realized online MP is important these days?!
@Mugzippit @ClayMeow I completely disagree. Nintendo needs to get with the times and until they do, every game that has multiplayer and does NOT support online play should be docked a point right off the bat. So after you play single-player, you need to invite friends over to extend the game instead of being able to hop online? It's ridiculous.
ClayMeow's comments