How the hell do you know it's bribery? Everybody has their own opinion and taste when it comes to games. Just because you don't like something doesn't mean that others won't like it. Not everybody is the same as you, you butthurt cow.

Keep telling yourself that the media was bribed into giving Titanfall a good score just to make yourself feel better cow. It's too funny.

Here is evidence of a butthurt cow. LOL

The sony cows are so butthurt about this game getting a high score, and I'm here laughing my ass off.

Just goes to show that graphical quality does not equal to game quality.

Compare Titanfall to Killzone and you'll see what I mean.

Make other posters feel sorry for me? It's the other way around man, I'm making others feel sorry for you. First, you post a topic about me on another website, then post here after months of not posting to reply to me, then threaten to report me to a mod. I struck a nerve in you. Don't deny it. Did I make you cry?

Don't act like you know what my intentions are. Just because I view the sony fanbase as negative and some things about Sony as negative doesn't mean you know my intentions. You assume that I am trolling, but in fact, these are all my views. You assume I am a troll because my posts doesn't hold Sony and sony fanboys in the highest regard. Again, answer my question; Why don't you consider posts by obvious sony fanboy trolls as trolling? Is it because of bias?

Not replying to you anymore here, if you want to continue the discussion, private messaging would be better as our discussion now does not talk about how Sony lies about the PS4.

In fact, our discussion will attract mods as it is not in line with the topic anymore.

Trolling? What trolling? If you read my posts its not trolling. I may be making fun of Sony fanboys(which Sony fanboys here are guilty of too, even more so), but aside from that, its not trolling. I'm saying my opinion and I'm giving links as evidence. No trolling there unless you choose to be ultra sensitive to criticism on Sony and its fanbase. Which ironically the Xbox has been getting a lot of in these forums. Why don't you consider posts by obvious sony fanboy trolls as trolling? Is it because of bias?

I noticed how you posted only now after months of not posting just to reply to me. Man, my posts do really strike a nerve in you doesn't it? First, post a topic about me on another website, then post here after months of not posting to reply to me, then threaten to report me to a mod. Dat nerve strike.

Anyways, I'm going to give you a break since obviously my posts do affect you a lot. lol.

Hmm.. I wonder why you posted about me and created a topic on me on the other sites though. Now you are going to report me to a mod?Someone is a tattle-tale and is a very sensitive person. I apologize if I hurt your feelings over a forum post on the internet. No, really I do apologize.

First you tell me to shut up because of the negative connotations that my post has against Sony, then you call me annoying and to go away which is most probably because my post has negative connotations about Sony.

Where is the freedom of speech here?

Funny, if this was Microsoft, you wouldn't be singing the same tune. Hypocrisy..

One PR person? Sid Shuman is Sony Computer Entertainment of America's Social Media manager. How could such a big detail about a video game be carelessly thrown around?

The truth is, you cannot deny that Sony promised 1080p / 60fps for Killzone : SF, which both run at a lower performance for both single player and multiplayer. Only a delusional fanboy such as yourself would deny both.

Here is what Guerrilla Games said on the multiplayer portion of the game, back in September when Guerilla games said that the multiplayer portion will run at 60 fps " a lot of the time." Where was this " a lot of the time."? More like 40-44 FPS average. If you deny that again, then you should reflect on how much denials you have been feeding yourself.

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2013-09-26-guerrilla-killzone-shadow-fall-multiplayer-runs-at-60-fps-a-lot-of-the-time

http://playeressence.com/killzone-shadow-falls-multiplayer-60fps-lot-time-guerrilla-games-said-lied-faces/

Anyways, my job here is done. Only delusional fanboys still believe otherwise in regards to DRM and resolution.

Google Choice-supportive Bias everyone and you will understand why cows like the ones in this thread exist.

I am buying a PS4 over the Xbox One but I am no cow. There is more hypocrisy from cows than lems.

Ridiculous FUD? Read the links I posted before bickering nonsense, if you want to debate with me about it, let's go ahead. Go debunk me. Nobody has, except people have been assuming to know Sony's intentions. I've posted links about DRM patents and interviews where Jack Tretton said they would allow publishers decide whether games have DRM or not. Naysayers have posted no evidence otherwise, but conjecture.

Funny how you can assume that Sony never planned on implementing DRM? What are you, a Sony employee? Just because they don't announce it to the whole world doesn't mean that they weren't planning it. Ever heard of trade secrets?

Again, as I have told others. If you can assume that Sony never intended on implementing DRM. Show me the proof. If you don't have any proof then I can safely assume too that Sony was indeed planning to implement DRM. I have partial proof showing that Sony was considering DRM with the interview and patents.

Give me the proof that Sony was never considering DRM and we'll settle this once and for all. Otherwise, all you say is conjecture.

It's also so very funny that you had to post off site about me. I never said PS4 had DRM. If you read my post then you would know that all I was saying that Sony was considering DRM. But whatever makes you happy man, keep staying in denial fanboy. If it makes you happy :)

I've debated these other people, and they have all ended up admitting that Sony had considered putting DRM, including letting third-party publishers decide whether to put DRM or not, like tormentos.

Their pitiful arguments are funny, saying that third-party publishers are not Sony, which is true, but how is Sony allowing 3rd-party publishers dictate whether there is DRM on your console any different?

Go read the links I posted you blind fanboy.

http://www.engadget.com/2013/06/11/playstation-4-drm-policies-third-party/

http://ps4daily.com/2013/06/sony-changed-playstation-4-drm-policy-after-xbox-one-outrage/

http://arstechnica.com/gaming/2013/02/sony-uk-exec-ps4-used-game-question-isnt-clarified-just-yet/

http://www.ign.com/articles/2013/01/03/report-new-sony-patent-blocks-second-hand-games