If you can assume that Sony didn't intend to implement DRM. I can assume that Sony intended to implement DRM. Unless you are a Sony executive/employee. What evidence have you that they didn't intend to implement DRM. I have my links. Where's yours?
It's funny how Sony is the good guy all the time and that you assume that Sony would only implement DRM because they were forced to when you have no idea of their intentions. Again, if you can assume that Sony didn't intend to implement DRM. I can assume that Sony intended to implement DRM. No evidence points towards Sony not considering implementing DRM, but if you read my previous posts you would see that they were considering to have DRM.
I never said that first party games would be DRM. All I said is that they would allow third party developers to choose whether their game has DRM or not. Quit putting words into my mouth. If you read my entire post you wouldn't be posting nonsense.
No they were very clear on what they say and even Treton basically say that is the developers problem to face outrage by consumers,he fiercely claim that they will not do it,and before that interview Yoshida stated the same.
Now if developers blocked games on xbox one and wanted to do the same on PS4 sony would not say anything but of they wanted to block games on xbox one and not on PS4 they would say nothing as well is call neutral,they give the choice to developers it up to them to screw up with consumers,and it would have been that way if developers actually dare to block used games people who do this would stop buying games that implemented the feature period.
Fact is MS confirmed this was true,sony never did and deny it so yeah you can assume what you want about a patent facts are there and MS wanted to go forward even that sony since February 2013 claimed it would not block them,it wasn't until the after E3 outrage that MS saw how horrible xbox one pre-orders were doing that they change it everything.
First-party games are irrelevant. What's relevant to the discussion is that Sony would allow publishers to implement DRM on their console. The majority of publishers are third-party.
Sony didn't have any policies restricting DRM for third-party publishers. Jack Tretton said it himself, that is of course until the backlash from DRM.How many times do I have to repeat that to you? Sony didn't force DRM, but they didn't disallow it either.
A quote that applies to this; "All that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing."
You have no point what so ever the implementation of DRM was going to happen on the developers side not sony's side,which they can still do now,in fact every developer on xbox one or PS4 can chose to require online for the game to work which would allow for easy finding if the game was played on another console and actually blocking you from playing the game,that still exist to this day developers don't do it because they know better.
Now what MS was implementing was DRM on a much lower level than developers it was at system level,and they had to make an update just to remove the DRM scheme from the unit,sony didn't have that period because they never planed DRM at low level like MS did this is a fact period.
hahaha brofists hasn't changed
I cant deny that PS4 is more powerful, but it is a fact that they lied about killzone, Thief is better on XB1 and tomb raider isn't exactly a graphical masterpiece.
Ryse craps on killzones graphics....that IS a fact.
by cows own rules Killzone is a blurry mess
Again with the conjecture from Tormentos. Why am I not surprised? If there is anybody who would defend everything about Sony no matter how bad it is for them it would be you. Now send me all the links where Tretton claimed that he would not support DRM before the date of the interview where he said Sony will allow DRM. Quit making things up.
tormentos : Jack Tretton say that is the developers problem to face outrage by consumers,he fiercely claim that they will not do it,and before that interview Yoshida stated the same.(Made up: When did he say that?! Link please, also the date must be before the interview where Tretton said they would allow DRM on the PS4, so as not to show Sony's views after the backlash over the Xbox One used games fiasco.)
Please send me evidence where they will allow DRM on both consoles today.
I repeat what I have said several times, but you choose to ignore it. Sony would allow DRM on their console as stated in the interview.
Answer my question.
How is allowing DRM on your console a good thing?
The majority of developers/publishers are third-party. How is that good?
Just because Sony's first-party games would not have DRM, it still does not change the fact that they would allow 3rd party developers to put DRM on the game or not.
Also, I can't stand reading your sentences, the punctuation, the grammar, the spelling are just atrocious. Take a look at your own post and see if you can understand all that dribble. I can barely understand it. It's english for pre-schoolers. You have my ranking as the worst cow on this forum. No offense, just saying the truth. Sometimes you can't reason with people with an intellectual level such as yours.
Example? tormentos: in fact every developer on xbox one or PS4 can chose to require online for the game to work which would allow for easy finding if the game was played another console and actually blocking you from playing the game,that still exist to this day developers don't do it because they know better.
Tormentos, you seem to forget that credibility does not stand alone on the person. One must provide evidence. As I have, but which you cows are still too blind to look at.
In conclusion, no use debating with an extremely blind fanboy such as yourself that will defend Sony in everything. I don't deserve to look at such horribly written paragraphs, otherwise my IQ might drop.
Log in to comment