[QUOTE="Zaistev_basic"]Amen, to whoever make this thread. I totally agree with the post. I've been a memebr of Gamespot ever since 1997. System Wars was created just prior to the release of the first XBox. I've talked to Casey before when he was not yet a moderator. He used to defend Nintendo before.It's good that he became a moderator after years of supporing the gamespot, however, he has no right whatsoever to take out our rights toexpress ourselves in the system wars. I understant the bashing, trolling, and flaming, as it was alreadypart of the rules, which is understandable in the Forums. But when he created a post about "Games vs Sales" at the time when Wii overtakes X360, it just shows that like many in system wars, he is also a fanboy, no more no less, except that he is a moderator. I just hope he does not abuse his position. There is absolutely no need for a vote of a rule regarding Sales vs Games. Sales and Games are too broad to begin with, and there will be specifics like the sales of games, the impact of games, etc etc. All will be forgotten if ever Casey apologizes for his fanboyish bold move to make a rule regarding "Sales vs Games"that questions the dignity, credibility, and integrity of Gamespot.CaseyWegner
that makes no sense, dude. did you not notice all the arguing going on about it? it's not like i went "oh crap, the wii just passed the 360 and is now second place in sales. i better do something about this."
All yourSales vs Game thread is give people a reason to shoot down any thread that even mentions sales. Like it or not video games is a business and the purpose of a business is to make money not make AAA games. And the only way to judge if a system or game is sucessful is by how many units it sells. I'm tired of threads that end withGames > SALES, {insertlink to SALE > GAMES thread} k thanksbaimoving on. Gamespot is the one that makes thehype and Gamespot is the one that flops the games. And then you complain when people are disappointed posting there opinions about it.
Log in to comment