Like I said in your other post, Mass Effect has better face animations you tool. BTW Since when did graphics alone merit GOTY? Killzone 2 won't even have the best graphics next year anyways. If Killzone has to rely on its gameplay to get a good score, its pretty much screwed.
I guess you prefer your leather chair, but thats because you never sat in my recliner, its a thing a of beauty ;). BTW I have seen what a high end PC can do because I have friends with them and I have playedon many PC games on high end pc at pc gaming lounges. I don't get why it isn't a legit reason why360 users can't rub Bioshock in Ps3 users faces.For some reason your trying to associate a majority of the ps3 users with PC gamers. Unless you are a hardcore gamer you most lieklywill not invest in a good gaming PC and a PS3. With that said most PS3 users will never get to experience Bioshock. therefore I can rub it in there faces because they don't have a game as good looking right now.
subrosian
In a graphics debate thread... something you have to admit is pointless for ps3 vs 360 if you've seen what the high-end looks like on PC? Bioshock is such an excellent game that it's an absolute shame PS3-only gamers will be missing out. Rubbing graphics that aren't even the high-end for this particular game in PS3 owner's faces though?
And my leather chair is a recliner with an ottoman and rocks some serious socks.
True. Im not really using the graphics of Bioshock to piss ps3 users off, just the game in general. It is no secret that the PS3 could run Bioshock. However, the game itself is a thing of beauty and I love that they won't get to experience it. Most of them that is.
Yea okay bud, the faces in mass effect and alan wake look better than Kill Zone easily. Are you an idiot? Because Kill Zone 1 sucked and Kill Zone 2will suck. Nothing innovative about it at all. The only thing it has going for it is the animations.
I guess you prefer your leather chair, but thats because you never sat in my recliner, its a thing a of beauty ;). BTW I have seen what a high end PC can do because I have friends with them and I have playedon many PC games on high end pc at pc gaming lounges. I don't get why it isn't a legit reason why360 users can't rub Bioshock in Ps3 users faces.For some reason your trying to associate a majority of the ps3 users with PC gamers. Unless you are a hardcore gamer you most lieklywill not invest in a good gaming PC and a PS3. With that said most PS3 users will never get to experience Bioshock. therefore I can rub it in there faces because they don't have a game as good looking right now.
but i wasnt really reffering to the pc..THNX 4 D HEADS UP THOUGH~!!!
subrosian
You cannot *ignore* the PC in a graphics debate. Debating the PS3 vs. Xbox 360 graphics is like debating whether a stock Honda Civic is a better race car than a Toyota Camry - who really cares? They end product is quite similar here - and at the end of the day, the differences between the two are so subtle that you have no room to claim any "ownage" here.
Meanwhile, you're completely ignoring the Enzo Ferrari known as the PC that just blew past you. Console gamers only ignore the PC in the 360 vs. PS3 debate because it puts into perspective how miniscule the difference between the two consoles really is... it is the ultimate mirror in which the stupidity of the fanboyism surrounding both consoles is shown.
And who cares why? Ferraris are so much more expensive and so much better than the honda and toyota. However the PC is not much better than either console in terms of graphics, only slightly as of right now. The cost however is huge. Atleast with the Ferrari and toyota comparison the ferrari is way more expensive but way better. the PC on the other hand is not way better that the two consoles at this point and its way more expensive.
No, it isn't. In my original post I demonstrated that my dual-core, 2gb DDR2-800, GeForce 8600 system *including an xbox 360 controller* upgrade costs less than an Xbox 360, yet offers better performance. It runs Oblivion better, it runs Bioshock better, and in a few months, it will be running Gears of War and Unreal Tournament 3 better.
PC gaming gets far too maligned by console gamers - and for what? So you can have a pointless showdown between PS3 and 360, while ignoring that consoles have become some expensive, that it's really not much more to build a PC that offers a huge leap in performance?
If you are going to talk about PCs being "only slightly better" - yet claim they are "way more expensive", you're out of your mind. I claimed that my mid-range PC offered better performance for less money, I didn't claim a record. Yet, if you're going to claim a high-end PC (which can be significantly more expensive - it's the cutting edge) is only "slightly better" - you've absolutely ignored reality. A GeForce 8800gtx with a Core 2 Duo or Quad absolutely chews what consoles could do.
They only reason I bring all of this up, is that it's simply pointless to have a PS3 vs 360 graphics debate anymore. It's relevant if you say "I want a 360 over a Wii because the graphics are significantly better" - it's not really relevant to say "the PS3 is slightly better in some games, worse in others, than the 360, therefore because of this one game, it wins the graphics trophy!". Please, if you're that concerned, buy a gaming PC - if you bought both these consoles (360 + PS3) you've already spent enough to demonstrate you can easily afford one.
Otherwise, stop tarnishing Bioshock's good name by dragging it through the mud of this console war.
I have seen games at there best on the PC and I have seen games at there best on a PS3 and a 360 and there is little diffrence between graphics. So you are crazy. BTW I didn't know its irrlevant to like to relax on a nice sofa chair with surround sound, anda 60 inch hdtv. Rather than being hobbled over onan uncomfortablecomputer chair. Some people work all day with computers, being able to get away from then for any small time at all is a relief. BTW I prefer a controller over a keyboard and mose, so how is it irrlevant to want a console over a PC and use graphics as justification?
but i wasnt really reffering to the pc..THNX 4 D HEADS UP THOUGH~!!!
subrosian
You cannot *ignore* the PC in a graphics debate. Debating the PS3 vs. Xbox 360 graphics is like debating whether a stock Honda Civic is a better race car than a Toyota Camry - who really cares? They end product is quite similar here - and at the end of the day, the differences between the two are so subtle that you have no room to claim any "ownage" here.
Meanwhile, you're completely ignoring the Enzo Ferrari known as the PC that just blew past you. Console gamers only ignore the PC in the 360 vs. PS3 debate because it puts into perspective how miniscule the difference between the two consoles really is... it is the ultimate mirror in which the stupidity of the fanboyism surrounding both consoles is shown.
And who cares why? Ferraris are so much more expensive and so much better than the honda and toyota. However the PC is not much better than either console in terms of graphics, only slightly as of right now. The cost however is huge. Atleast with the Ferrari and toyota comparison the ferrari is way more expensive but way better. the PC on the other hand is not way better that the two consoles at this point and its way more expensive.
Buckethead is a guitarist and not a band. However he has played in many bands such as Praxis, and even the new GunsN' Roses in 2001-2002. Buckethead career has been from the late 80s until now and he has written or played over 300 songs. Just go to youtube and type in Buckethead. Here are two links to my two favorite songs he has written. If you are not into guitar only music then it is not for you. Anyways here you go. He is my favorite guitarist and plays a wide range of styles. BTW he probably is a little wierd, but he is so awesome.
Yea It really not getting enough hype, when idiots on this forum are saying its going to be better than Halo 3. Except the fact that it wont and Halo is a proven AAA franchise and Haze doesn't even deserevd to be mentioned in the same breath as Halo, Bioshock, and CoD4
lol.... topic should be ... x360 is on par and better than ps2's graphics.paranoiasurviva
And what game that is OUT for the PS3 has better graphics than Gears of War? (Mention i said out because you would most likely resort to Killzone 2, which you haven't even played so that doesn't count.)
Log in to comment