@Cow4ever with every post you slip further and further into the land of ignorance.daviwinnDon't you have a monster jam show to attend?
Cow4ever's forum posts
Honestly? I don't think that way so ever.. When I hear terrorist I just think of some extremist jackass that really can fit in any racial group or religion most times.sSubZerOoBut most times it is an arab or muslim.
[QUOTE="BlbecekBobecek"]
[QUOTE="sts106mat"]I read a preview in "360" a uk magazine months ago, that was about Rage, they went crazy about the graphics (unusual for them as they tend to be more like edge than some of the other mags). they said it was almost impossible to believe it was running from a 360. that same issue they reviewed crysis2, giving it a decent score and saying that its graphics were great, just not as good as what they had seen from rage. as for your opinion that crysis 2 isn't up there with the best looking PS3 exclusive, have a listen to this guy (all the way till the end though) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_pZf-MNo4Fgsts106mat
Sorry, too much idiocy for me to handle for more than a few seconds.
KZ3 vs Crysis 2 debate was definitely put to an end by this video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5CBd6QX8nps Its the only comparison I know of that compares similar scenes and effects of those two games and its clear Crysis 2 is not even close. Look at the glass shards or the water that actually has physics in Killzone 3 while being a just a flat with flat effects on it in Crysis 2. Not even a contest and thats BEFORE you consider performance.
you mean you dont want to hear someone disagreeing with your opinion. The video you linked proves nothing, both games equally comparable. by the way was the PS3 version of crysis2? or 360? 360 version had a higher resolution than PS3 version. also youtube comparison video? seriously? Your video proves nothing either. It's just a hillbilly admitting he has no knowledge about the subject whatsoever. And if it doesn't a matter why are you discussing this. The games are very far from equally comparable. KZ3 had better AA, resolution, FPS, no screen tear, animations etc etcehm Crysis 2 did NOT put 360 back on the map. Gears 2 look much better in the first place.360 fans here on SW are really celebrating so called console graphics kings that dont really deserve it - Crysis 2 and Gears 3. Before Crysis 2, nothing came even close to PS3 exclusives.
Crysis 2 put 360 back on the map with very impressive lighting effects and only performance issues, texture popins, bad physics and lack of polish kept it from being up there on par with the best looking PS3 exclusives.
Now Gears 3 is on the horizon and 360 fans are dancing around their fireplayces worshipping a new CGK again, but from what Ive seen its basically just another Unreal Engine game with some nice textures and incredibly lame character animations. It will indeed be excellent shooter that will be great fun to play, but its not much about graphics.
And in the meantime idSoft is cooking their Rage and many Carmacs quotes indicate that 360 will be getting the superior version once again - and from what Ive seen so far THIS is finally the game on 360 that has a shot on matching and maybe even beating games like God of War 3, Killzone 2, Killzone 3 and Uncharted 2 graphically, yet Im not hearing much hype about it. Your thoughts?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CxaaNosNa_Q
BlbecekBobecek
Log in to comment