[QUOTE="Cow4ever"][QUOTE="KC_Hokie"]links pleaseKC_HokieJust look in the Sony and Microsoft articles. It's in the box to the right.Yea...why wikipedia isn't considered a valid source in any college class. Well then at least they don't have less revenue and assets since you haven't provided any source yourself.
Cow4ever's forum posts
Yeah I know I was shocked too! But Sony has much bigger costs though so currently they operate at a much bigger loss than Microsoft.Sony - US$ 155.94 billion (2011)
MS - US$ 108.7 billion (FY 2011)
So there you.. oh wait :shock: I'm actually shocked at that, i far expected MS to be worth(assets) of about 200bill.
JohnF111
[QUOTE="Cow4ever"][QUOTE="KC_Hokie"]Sony generates more revenue and has more assets...where did you come up with that?KC_HokieWikipedialinks please Just look in the Sony and Microsoft articles. It's in the box to the right.
[QUOTE="arkephonic"]
[QUOTE="Demonjoe93"]
True, except there's this other department the PS2 crushes the PS3 in: Games. The size and quality of the PS2's library crushes that of the PS3.
Demonjoe93
Yeah, considering this generation is done and everything and every PS3 game to ever be released has been released already, right?
That doesn't matter. He was stating that the PS3 as of right now is better than the PS2, despite that this gen isn't over yet.
No games on PS2 comes close to the top PS3. I'm sure the library was bigger but in quality it doesn't stand a chance. Although I haven't played SoTC yet, but it's soon not a PS2 exclusive anymore lol[QUOTE="Cow4ever"][QUOTE="FoxbatAlpha"]Sony Corp as a whole is loosing money still. The only think that can save them is to change their name to Microsoft after they get bought out by MS. KC_HokieSony generates more revenue and got more in total assets than Microsoft. Higher costs, but still.Sony generates more revenue and has more assets...where did you come up with that? Wikipedia
Sony Corp as a whole is loosing money still. The only think that can save them is to change their name to Microsoft after they get bought out by MS. FoxbatAlphaSony generates more revenue and got more in total assets than Microsoft. Higher costs, but still.
I know a joke about jelly but I would probably get suspended again if I post it. >_>22ToothpicksHit it!
[QUOTE="Cow4ever"][QUOTE="charizard1605"]I understand that it's your opinion, and I respect it, but you have to understand, that is not an argument that you can make or defend against anyone.Even if you were to look at best consoles of all time, you'd need to look at the stuff the systems brought to the table when they launched- sure, something like wireless controllers is considered standard now, but is it fair to expect it on a system that launched in 1991?- and on that count, again, the SNES, the PS2, the PS1 and perhaps most of all, the N64 have the PS3 beaten.And as for the quality of game libraries, it depends on what you're looking for. The N64 has probably the greatest AAA titles to total games released ratio, and it has some of the most groundbreaking games of all time. The SNES represents the pinnacle of the 2D era. The PS2 wins by sheer numbers. The PS3 doesn't even chart on any of those parameters.It's a great system, and my personal favorite from Sony (after the PSP, of course), but honestly, it wouldn't even be in the running for 'greatest console of all time.charizard1605Well we're talking about two different things really. I am not talking about the impact the consoles have, only how good it is, and going from PS2 to PS3 was like from night to day the PS3 is just much much better in every way. Maybe the N64 etc was more influential but so was also maybe the T-Ford, still sucks compared to a Ferrari today (I don't know anything about cars so maybe that's a bad comparision). And take for example SNES I'm sure it was the pinnacle of 2D but right there you see how much more enjoyment you get from PS3 since well it's 3D and adds SO much to the games. So as I see it, it's really hard to compare consoles with each other AND compared to their time since there are so many different conditions to take into consideration. But compare them to each other and there's more to discuss. Games today are just that much more enjoyable IMO. I take Uncharted 2, Demon's Souls, Portal 2 games like that any day rather than the combined libraries of N64, PS2 etc games just have come so far, not only in graphics. I mean I played OoT both when it came out and just recently and both times it was a pain. And this I felt with alot of games. It's just with the PS3 I finally can truly enjoy a game. Well, that's your opinion, and I suppose I should not argue against that. If you feel the PS3 is the best console ever, and if it is the system from which you have derived maximum satisfaction, then who am I to tell you otherwise? To you, it's the best system, and I respect that. Thanks and likewise!
I understand that it's your opinion, and I respect it, but you have to understand, that is not an argument that you can make or defend against anyone.[QUOTE="Cow4ever"] Well we're talking about the best console of all time aren't we? So obviously we have to put them against each other not against their time. I'm sure all those consoles had a big library but the only one that comes close to PS3 in terms of quality is PS2 and it's pretty far from PS3 still. My opinion of course.charizard1605
Even if you were to look at best consoles of all time, you'd need to look at the stuff the systems brought to the table when they launched- sure, something like wireless controllers is considered standard now, but is it fair to expect it on a system that launched in 1991?- and on that count, again, the SNES, the PS2, the PS1 and perhaps most of all, the N64 have the PS3 beaten.
And as for the quality of game libraries, it depends on what you're looking for. The N64 has probably the greatest AAA titles to total games released ratio, and it has some of the most groundbreaking games of all time. The SNES represents the pinnacle of the 2D era. The PS2 wins by sheer numbers. The PS3 doesn't even chart on any of those parameters.
It's a great system, and my personal favorite from Sony (after the PSP, of course), but honestly, it wouldn't even be in the running for 'greatest console of all time.'
Well we're talking about two different things really. I am not talking about the impact the consoles have, only how good it is, and going from PS2 to PS3 was like from night to day the PS3 is just much much better in every way. Maybe the N64 etc was more influential but so was also maybe the T-Ford, still sucks compared to a Ferrari today (I don't know anything about cars so maybe that's a bad comparision). And take for example SNES I'm sure it was the pinnacle of 2D but right there you see how much more enjoyment you get from PS3 since well it's 3D and adds SO much to the games. So as I see it, it's really hard to compare consoles with each other AND compared to their time since there are so many different conditions to take into consideration. But compare them to each other and there's more to discuss. Games today are just that much more enjoyable IMO. I take Uncharted 2, Demon's Souls, Portal 2 games like that any day rather than the combined libraries of N64, PS2 etc games just have come so far, not only in graphics. I mean I played OoT both when it came out and just recently and both times it was a pain. And this I felt with alot of games. It's just with the PS3 I finally can truly enjoy a game. Sorry about no space, I tried to fix it but glitchspot doesn't work
Log in to comment