Swiftstrike what are you talking about? The G92 is supposed to be more powerful than the gtx. It supposedly has 1 teraflop of power as opposed to the gtx's 330 gigaflops. @ TC, you are wasting a lot of money there. Get a q6600 and overclock it, since it only costs 266 and is almost as good, even better if overclocked. There is no such thing as quad sli with anything but the 7950gx2, and you don't even need two 8800s. Just get the cheapest 8800gtx you can find, NOT ULTRA. You only need 2 gigs of ram, and 1 kw psu is a waste. Just get the 700w OCZ. For motherboard get a p35, 650i, or a 680i. And get everything from newegg.comimrlybord7
ineed a card that is much more powerful than the 8800gtx.
all the dx10 cards are too weak for my tastes. I need something that will play crysis at 1900 x 1200 with 4aa and 16af. All other graphical settings at maximum. and i want 60fps.
when the most powerful dx10 cards can barely play the first game built from the ground up with dx10 in mind, then what does that tell you about the future of these cards?
i cant even imagine how they would be able to run project offset. That game has way more going on at one time. And what about Huxley? I want an mmo with 100 x 100 battles to actually look good. The screens they released look as good as gears and ut3. I highly doubt in the battlefield that we will actually see those visuals because these cards are too weak. The 8800 series struggles on stalker. Hell, a 8800gtx cant even max out lost planet. You have to overclock the thing to hell just to get over 30fps average
Log in to comment