May I suggest a re-phrasal of the title of this thread to suit this discussion a little better? How about "Why you don't use Google as a search engine?"
I commiserate with you Sanders supporters. I know your intentions are in the right places and all. However, reality is gonna hit like a freight train in the months ahead.
"The test is imperfect​, as ​it relies primarily on the length of words and sentences rather than the complexity of their meaning."
I love when articles discredit themselves. The intention of this article has nothing to do with analyzing speeches to get a sense of the speakers intelligence. These journalists are simply upset that Trump has people listening to him. If his ideas are so absurd and his rhetoric is so asinine. Then let his campaign implode under the weight of his own nonsense, rather than resorting to these desperate attempts to ruin his campaign. Every time they make an attempt like this they just end up looking like sulking children who are angry that they're not getting any attention.
With a %98 success rate, I fear that this "rigorous interview process" is more exclusive than they're willing to admit. I'd be more interested to know how many inmates are attempting to get in the program and are turned down.
We will never see an in depth scientific study looking into why there isn't an even gender spread in truck drivers. Correct me if I'm wrong but, the profession seems to be vastly dominated by men. These people who are concerned about gender disparity in professions only seem to study jobs that they deem to be important.
The original source of this article lists nothing specific whatsoever besides the Woman's name. No citations, no listed area, and no specific law enforcement agency. The name of the author is listed as "Guy". The whole website looks sketchy. This looks like a hoax.
Log in to comment