@Damedius:
My argument is solid because it is 100% factual.
I am stating for a fact there is a lot of evidence against Trump. This is a pure fact. Your opinions on said evidence are pointless. You need to present your own data showing it is invalid, with valid sources.
You haven't even attempted to argue against and refute the massive amounts of evidence I posted. At least try, because you are losing this debate badly. Only one of us has data.
What version of facts are you using?
Surely it's not this "a thing that is known or proved to be true." or this "the truth about events as opposed to interpretation".
Maybe you could tell me what you think a fact is because you use the word rather loosely.
Log in to comment