Damedius' forum posts

Avatar image for Damedius
Damedius

737

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1  Edited By Damedius
Member since 2010 • 737 Posts

@zaryia said:
@jeezers said:

@Damedius: WaPo is owned by Jeff Bezos hardly surprising. Screw WaPo

You agree the Ukranian Interference is fake news and propagated by Russia though, right?

No the DNC peddles every excuse in the book as to why they lost the last election and why they will lose the next one.

You will spend the next 4 years propagating the latest conspiracy theory as to why your team lost.

Avatar image for Damedius
Damedius

737

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Damedius
Member since 2010 • 737 Posts

@zaryia said:
@Damedius said

Are you sure?

According to the ICA Briefing a few weeks ago, yes.

Senators were briefed on Russian campaign to blame Ukraine for 2016 election meddling in the fall

https://www.cnn.com/politics/live-news/impeachment-inquiry-11-22-2019/h_cc82dcd426da9f2c9e79fb6d4eaa60eb

Senate Intel found no evidence of 2016 Ukrainian interference: report

https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/472721-senate-intel-committee-found-no-evidence-of-top-down-ukraine-interference

@Damedius said

Weren't you trying to tell us that Trump worked with Putin to win the election?

No. I wasn't. I stated the fact Russia interfered to help Trump. Nothing exciting, sorry.

@Damedius said:

You aren't going to come back after Trump wins again and tell us that the entire Republican party are working with the Russians?

I never said the GOP was working for Russia. Useful idiots? Perhaps, going by ICA and MR reports.

Also why are you derailing your own thread with fiction.

I'm just trying to get your conspiracy theories out in the open before the election if possible.

Avatar image for Damedius
Damedius

737

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3  Edited By Damedius
Member since 2010 • 737 Posts

@zaryia said:

An unwitting stooges? Sure. Intentional and receiving orders straight from him like a double agent, highly doubtful.

Parroting the Ukrainian Interference false equivalency is being an unwitting stooge. Russia wants people talking about that lie, according to the ICA. He is unintentionally doing their bidding.

Cruz promotes conspiracy that Ukraine "blatantly interfered" in U.S. election

https://www.axios.com/ted-cruz-ukraine-election-interference-0681b9b4-0980-44d0-8aeb-aa5a53a41960.html

Reality check: In 2014, Russia invaded, occupied and annexed the territory of Crimea from Ukraine. In response, the U.S. and much of the international community denounced Russia and refused to recognize its annexation of the peninsula.

  • During the 2016 election, Ukraine's ambassador to the U.S. Valeriy Chaly wrote an op-ed for The Hill in which he criticized candidate Trump for saying he would consider recognizing Crimea as Russian territory. That op-ed is one of several actions that Republicans say amount to election interference.

However, the scattershot criticisms from Ukrainian officials in the aftermath of Trump's Crimea comments differ greatly from the top-down, large-scale interference operation that the U.S. intelligence community has concluded was ordered directly by Vladimir Putin.

Are you sure?

Weren't you trying to tell us that Trump worked with Putin to win the election?

You aren't going to come back after Trump wins again and tell us that the entire Republican party are working with the Russians?

Avatar image for Damedius
Damedius

737

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4  Edited By Damedius
Member since 2010 • 737 Posts

It has come to this: Ted Cruz is Putin’s stooge

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/12/08/its-come-this-ted-cruz-is-putins-stooge/

And as for Cruz, Cold Warrior, Obama critic and anti-Putin hawk, he now declares there is evidence of Ukraine interference in our election because an op-ed was written criticizing Trump’s campaign rhetoric about Ukraine. This is what Cruz is now reduced to — making excuses for a president willing to stab Ukraine in the back to the utter delight of Putin.

Everybody works for Russia and Putin according to the Washington Post.

The american media today is going through McCarthyism 2.0.

You guys better check under your bed before you go to sleep to make sure there are no Russians there.

Avatar image for Damedius
Damedius

737

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Damedius
Member since 2010 • 737 Posts

You know what would be hilarious after this whole farce?

If they can't muster the 218 votes needed to impeach Trump.

Avatar image for Damedius
Damedius

737

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6  Edited By Damedius
Member since 2010 • 737 Posts

@n64dd said:

@Nuck81:

https://outline.com/Eb8GrV

The mentioning of Obama and other parties is showing that none of you actually care if the law is broken. Only if Trump is doing it. Which makes all of you dishonest.

The above link is 78 proven times Obama broke the law. Remember all the outrage you guys had during that? You won’t remember because it didn’t exist and you didn’t care.

That much is obvious.

All they do is repeat the same canned replies.

Nothing matters to them except that their teams wins by any means necessary.

Avatar image for Damedius
Damedius

737

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Damedius
Member since 2010 • 737 Posts

@zaryia said:

False equivalency and whataboutism.

Just because people were corrupt in the past (and not even in this same manner) doesn't make these current actions okay. That's silly.

You know what's silly?

You having conversations with 4 or 5 people and treating them like one person.

It's what makes you look like an idiot half the time you are posting.

Avatar image for Damedius
Damedius

737

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Damedius
Member since 2010 • 737 Posts

@zaryia said:

I know, simple syntax error. Sorry? He's going to be impeached. I guess this is going to be your next goal post move after all the previous debate losses.

So when the Democrats decide to Censure rather than impeach are you going to come back and tell us all how you knew this was going to happen?