Damedius' forum posts

Avatar image for Damedius
Damedius

737

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Damedius
Member since 2010 • 737 Posts

@zaryia said:
@Damedius said:

So you ban me and then quote my post asking a question.

I'm sure this was all done in "good faith".

Quit being a crybaby beta soyboy.

That looks like a ban worthy post if the moderators uphold the rules they claim to be enforcing when they ban me.

Avatar image for Damedius
Damedius

737

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Damedius
Member since 2010 • 737 Posts

@horgen said:
@Damedius said:
@horgen said:

You're spreading Russian propaganda. Why would we take anything from Russian security service serious without vetting it first?

And also. If your response warrants a ban, you would get banned by posting it, no matter who you respond to.

Why would we take anything from American intelligence serious?

How many times do you have to be tricked and lied to before you start to catch on?

So you trust Russian intelligence above your own?

Wait, you actually answered this already, and yes you would take Russian intelligence more serious than American (your own I presume) intelligence

So you ban me and then quote my post asking a question.

I'm sure this was all done in "good faith".

Avatar image for Damedius
Damedius

737

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Damedius
Member since 2010 • 737 Posts

@burntbyhellfire said:

Before y'all get your panties in a twist over the headline, did you actually read the bill or just the name of it? There is nothing in the bill that isn't already covered by existing laws.

https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/BILLS-115s2785is/pdf/BILLS-115s2785is.pdf

Of course they didn't.

They just came to this thread to say that the other team is bad and affirm that they support the good team.

Avatar image for Damedius
Damedius

737

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Damedius
Member since 2010 • 737 Posts

@judaspete said:

@zaryia: He doesn't trust the FBI report. To change his mind you would have to somehow come up with some piece of evidence on your own, I guess by hacking into the Kremlin yourself or something.

It's okay dude. The rest of us know you are in the right here.

Let's be honest, American intelligence agencies don't have the best track record.

Avatar image for Damedius
Damedius

737

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Damedius
Member since 2010 • 737 Posts

@zaryia said:

I provided my sources, the FBI, ICA, and SIC.....

Are you new to debating? Or reality?

You don't have any proof. You have hearsay.

I could say that you work for the CIA doesn't make it so, does it?

Avatar image for Damedius
Damedius

737

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Damedius
Member since 2010 • 737 Posts

@zaryia said:

But I just posted the proof.....

What's going on here. You can't just say things and they become true lol.

Exactly.

You can't just say things and they become true. You need evidence, something that is never provided.

Avatar image for Damedius
Damedius

737

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Damedius
Member since 2010 • 737 Posts

@zaryia said:

A) "In a classified briefing this fall, US intelligence officials told senators and their aides that Russia has engaged in a years-long campaign to shift the blame away from Russia and onto Ukraine for interfering in the 2016 American presidential campaign, according to two US officials."

Senators were told that the Russian disinformation operation focused on a handful of Ukrainians who openly criticized or sought to damage Trump’s candidacy — efforts that were significantly less organized than the multi-faceted election interference push ordered by Russian President Vladimir Putin, one US official said, confirming details first reported by the New York Times.

US intelligence officials also told lawmakers that Russia used intelligence operatives to spread now debunked conspiracies, along with established facts, to frame Ukraine for the interference in the 2016 campaign, the official said."

B) "We have no information that indicates that Ukraine interfered," Wray said.

That's literally proof of what I'm saying. I've just been paraphrasing the above 3 agencies, they are my source.

Are you that worried about losing a debate on an internet to the point where you will contest reality?

So you have no actual proof. Thank you, that's all I wanted.

Avatar image for Damedius
Damedius

737

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8  Edited By Damedius
Member since 2010 • 737 Posts

@zaryia said:

Take the L. Go take a debate class or something.

All you can do is post links to try and deflect when some one nails you on a point.

Again do you have any proof that Russia is involved in this latest conspiracy theory of yours?

Do you have any evidence whatsoever or are you just going to ignore the question, post another irrelevant link and claim you won?

Avatar image for Damedius
Damedius

737

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9  Edited By Damedius
Member since 2010 • 737 Posts

@zaryia said:

That's a goal post move. I said western world, those links show members of the western world. I didn't dodge. My fact check link literally answer your question,

"In other words, both Republicans and Democrats in the US — and many European nations — wanted Shokin gone for failing to clamp down on graft."

I even put it in big boy letters so you wouldn't lie in your next post, but you ended up lying in your next post anyway.

Do you concede there was no personal gain and the Biden conspiracy is fake, as the facts above show?

How many debates can you lose to me in a 48 hour period?

You said "on behalf of the western world." You made a gaffe just admit it. Most people couldn't care less. You pretending like everyone in the western world wanted him removed is idiotic. Throwing up another link to try and deflect doesn't help either.

There is no point doubling down and making yourself look worse. Just move on.

Avatar image for Damedius
Damedius

737

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Damedius
Member since 2010 • 737 Posts

@zaryia said:

So you agree the Ukranian conspiracy theory Cruz was talking about in your OP was false, right?

Do you agree with the fact it was made up by Russians to trick people, right?

This reflects poorly on Cruz.

I assume you have some proof for your conspiracy theories?

Call me a little skeptical but blaming Russia for everything you don't like seems a little naive.

When the Democrats lose and I have to listen to you blame Russia again....