Damedius' forum posts

Avatar image for Damedius
Damedius

737

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Damedius
Member since 2010 • 737 Posts

@ad1x2 said:
@leicam6 said:

Where was all this ire and fury from 45 when Jamal Khashoggi was snatched and cut up into pieces by a bonesaw?

Not a U.S. citizen and only one person compared to the number of U.S. citizens killed by Iran's actions. People don't seem to want to talk about the thousands of Iranian citizens that were killed due to that general's actions.

How about the millions killed by the American Empire?

Stop pretending you're the good guys.

Avatar image for Damedius
Damedius

737

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2  Edited By Damedius
Member since 2010 • 737 Posts

@sonicare said:

I do agree that it would be wise to address the corporate system in the US.

The corporations own the US. It's through them that the oligarchs in the US buy the political system through campaign contributions.

It's a system that ensures that what they want happens no matter what candidates or party gets elected.

However because those that are voting aren't very bright they just blame the other party.

Avatar image for Damedius
Damedius

737

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Damedius
Member since 2010 • 737 Posts

@vfighter said:

I'm confused but not surprised that the left is having,issues with this and trying to turn it into a negative. Just the status quo for them, whine bitch and scream about anything and everything the right does.

It isn't the right that is doing this. It's the American empire doing this. It's the same thing they have done regardless of who is in power.

I'm confused as to how oblivious the average American seems to be about it.

It's like you guys are completely clueless when it comes to history and geopolitics.

Avatar image for Damedius
Damedius

737

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Damedius
Member since 2010 • 737 Posts

@npiet1 said:
@Damedius said:

You gotta love American chutzpah.

Invading and occupying countries while claiming they are the victims.

It must suck living in a world where everyone hates you for your freedom.

So it's okay for them to attack the US but they can't attack them?

Are you serious?

How many nations has the US destroyed in the past 20 years?

Or as the propagandists like to call it "Spreading Democracy and Nation Building."

Avatar image for Damedius
Damedius

737

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Damedius
Member since 2010 • 737 Posts

@ulfrinn said:
@the_master_race said:
@ulfrinn said:

This general they just killed, it seems he was the one orchestrating the attacks against Americans and against the embassy.

not only the embassy, also Yemen, Syria and Saudi Arabia oil attacks , he was IRGC's mascot

And he was bragging about killing Americans while Iran's Ayatolla was taunting the US days earlier saying we can't do anything to stop them from killing Americans.

Loading Video...

Avatar image for Damedius
Damedius

737

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6  Edited By Damedius
Member since 2010 • 737 Posts

You gotta love American chutzpah.

Invading and occupying countries while claiming they are the victims.

It must suck living in a world where everyone hates you for your freedom.

Avatar image for Damedius
Damedius

737

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Damedius
Member since 2010 • 737 Posts

@zaryia said:
  • A majority of Domestic Terror has been from the far right recently. This is a confirmed fact by the FBI and GAO (And SPLC/ADL). Directly stated by them. You have not refuted it.
  • Most of Domestic Terror has been from the far right recently. This is a confirmed fact by the FBI and GAO (And SPLC/ADL). Directly stated by them. You have not refuted it.
  • I never said all. Anyone can look at my posts and see that.

Lose debates more often. Read what I'm writing and prove it wrong with citation, this isn't difficult.

I did refute two of the links you posted.

You then failed at math and reading comprehension. After that you just reposted the links and doubled down.

Speaking of recent, let's talk about Connor Betts.

Avatar image for Damedius
Damedius

737

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8  Edited By Damedius
Member since 2010 • 737 Posts

@zaryia said:

When every study/data-point on this topic says you're DEAD wrong and you still don't quit, lol.

You went from all to majority to most.

When you get caught you double down.

If you never admit you're wrong maybe no one will notice.

Avatar image for Damedius
Damedius

737

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Damedius
Member since 2010 • 737 Posts

@zaryia said:
@Damedius said:
@zaryia said:

1. Nearly half is "most" when the other 50% is split up between other groups.

2. You tell Wray he's wrong,

Wray told the Senate Judiciary Committee that the FBI has recorded about 100 domestic terrorism arrests in the last nine months. “A majority of the domestic terrorism cases we've investigated are motivated by some version of what you might call white supremacist violence,” he told the panel.

I can and WILL state for a fact most Domestic terror over the last few years is right wing. Going by the ADL, FBI, and CATO.

He contradicts himself or misspoke. You would have to ask him yourself.

"McGarrity said that nearly half of the cases involved racially motivated extremists, most of whom were white supremacists."

Most of nearly half isn't a majority.

1. It is a majority if the other half are split up among different groups. You no maths?

2. I'm not asking him anything, we have a congressional quote, and I'm stating a fact when quoting him. Wray was talking about the arrests. McGarrity was talking about potential terrorism cases that were being investigated. Both stats look very very bad for the Far Right, even that second lesser one. You're not down playing this by any means.

Just accept it, why are you even defending these people.

You no reading comprehension or maths

Nearly half were racially motivated, meaning less than a majority. Of those most were white supremacists.

So since we aren't given specifics we can't get the exact number. What we can tell from the wording is that it definitely isn't a majority.

Avatar image for Damedius
Damedius

737

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Damedius
Member since 2010 • 737 Posts
@zaryia said:

1. Nearly half is "most" when the other 50% is split up between other groups.

2. You tell Wray he's wrong,

Wray told the Senate Judiciary Committee that the FBI has recorded about 100 domestic terrorism arrests in the last nine months. “A majority of the domestic terrorism cases we've investigated are motivated by some version of what you might call white supremacist violence,” he told the panel.

I can and WILL state for a fact most Domestic terror over the last few years is right wing. Going by the ADL, FBI, and CATO.

He contradicts himself or misspoke. You would have to ask him yourself.

"McGarrity said that nearly half of the cases involved racially motivated extremists, most of whom were white supremacists."

Most of nearly half isn't a majority.