[QUOTE="ActionRemix"]I am now convinced that even the console version of BF3 will blow MW3 out of the water. I'm disappointed COD fanboys haven't been more creative in defending MW3. It's all PR codewords. Before the BF3 hype train left the station I had never heard COD described as "butter-smooth" and "Arcade-style." The current descriptions of COD gameplay remind me of the spin you hear during presidential campaigns. I keep hearing the same stale talking point: "MW3 will be 60 fps. BF3 will be 30 fps on console." That's because the engine is from 1999 and the resolution is 600p. BF3 will be 720p on console, but that doesn't seem to count for whatever reason. 60 fps IS better than 30 fps, but not at the expense of visual quality, map size, player count, vehicle count, and environmental destruction. I don't even think most people can tell 30 fps from 60 fps unless they're watching a side-by-side video. I have never seen animation so fluid as the animation in BF3, even in movies. The production value of the game I see in BF3 trailers is quite an achievement. I used to think we were still a few years away before the leap in graphics would justify the purchase of a new generation of consoles. This is a next generation game and will push the boundaries of even current gen graphics. The fence-sitters that say "just buy both games" are the most blind among us. Look, if you want to drop 120 bucks to buy two modern military shooters in the same month, then that's on you, but don't insist the rest of us have to waste 60 dollars so you can avoid making a decision on which game will provide you with the best quality experience. After watching the Caspian Border trailer, there is no doubt in my mind that game is BF3. Multiplayer gameplay for MW3 has been out for a couple years if you want to compare. lightleggyApplause, those are exactly my feelings. im not even a COD fanboy, I support both...hell I might be getting MW3 (but not on release...i'll wait for a price drop) but I will always think BF is better...the only "argument" cod fans know how to use against battlefield is "battlefield is not that popular, battlefield doesnt sell as much as cod so that means its worse" and "cod runs at 60 fps on consoles while bf runs at 30"
Ah, I played MW2 today with my friends, and it reminded me why CoD will ALWAYS be number one: action.
Headquarters on Scrapyard. 4v4. So much intense action, grenades flying everywhere, bullets tearing through here and there. Pure entertainment, simply. If it's possible to even come remotely close to having as fun in BF, you may as well shoot me.
COD will always be number one. Period.
Log in to comment