DangerousLiquid's forum posts

Avatar image for DangerousLiquid
DangerousLiquid

452

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 DangerousLiquid
Member since 2011 • 452 Posts

[QUOTE="DangerousLiquid"]

[QUOTE="soulitane"]Doesn't look like it offers anything good to me.soulitane

1 year of the paid Elite service? ;) U special?

Why would I care about a year for a service where the only features that are announced are free?

No, no. It's the paid version. :| Everybody else will have the free version for life.

Avatar image for DangerousLiquid
DangerousLiquid

452

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 DangerousLiquid
Member since 2011 • 452 Posts

Doesn't look like it offers anything good to me.soulitane

1 year of the paid Elite service? ;) U special?

Avatar image for DangerousLiquid
DangerousLiquid

452

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 DangerousLiquid
Member since 2011 • 452 Posts

The contents include:

- A year of Elite
- Elite perks: in-game emblem, camouflage, clan XP boost, player card, and more
- Exclusive PlayStation Network theme
- Juggernaut outfit for your Xbox Live avatar
- Fancy steel case
- 100+ pages of sketches and other military source material
- Unique disc art! Not that you'll see it much

SOURCE

Avatar image for DangerousLiquid
DangerousLiquid

452

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 DangerousLiquid
Member since 2011 • 452 Posts

[QUOTE="DangerousLiquid"]

[QUOTE="FoolwithaLancer"]

If they're doing this, they're going to have to switch to Dedicated servers no doubt. 12 player matches in MW2 Are laggy as hell, don't want to even know what 32 would be.

And CoD isn't even meant for above 16 players, It's not a tactical game, it's a nice run and gun have fun game that most people enjoy to relax with, 32 players would be a exploit and nade fest....

wis3boi

What if it's a gigantic map, like some of BC2's? They are very big and work rather well with very many players.

they better, otherwise it would be a cluster**** of explosions and killstreaks

Yeah, but we both know IW ain't putting forward a small map for 32 players. ;)

Avatar image for DangerousLiquid
DangerousLiquid

452

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 DangerousLiquid
Member since 2011 • 452 Posts

If they're doing this, they're going to have to switch to Dedicated servers no doubt. 12 player matches in MW2 Are laggy as hell, don't want to even know what 32 would be.

And CoD isn't even meant for above 16 players, It's not a tactical game, it's a nice run and gun have fun game that most people enjoy to relax with, 32 players would be a exploit and nade fest....

FoolwithaLancer

What if it's a gigantic map, like some of BC2's? They are very big and work rather well with very many players.

Avatar image for DangerousLiquid
DangerousLiquid

452

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 DangerousLiquid
Member since 2011 • 452 Posts

If they are moving to 32 players in a game, they have got to get rid of P2P and go with dedicated servers.

I also think that 32 players in a game is just to much for the styIe of gameplay CoD excels at. They are all about fast paced infantry focused gameplay. Making it 32 players is just asking for spam and the killstreaks to be extremely overpowered. Imagine getting a chopper gunner with 32 players in the game. How many kills could you get in a few seconds? It would be massive amounts.

Anything over 16 is pushing it. Servers that had more than 20 people in CoD 4 on the PC became just chaotic nade fests in which the winner had nothing to do about skill and had all to do about how you could tweak your character to cause the most damage by throwing nades.

Wasdie

True. Hopefully, all attack pointstreaks are disabled in this mode, if it even exists.

Avatar image for DangerousLiquid
DangerousLiquid

452

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 DangerousLiquid
Member since 2011 • 452 Posts

So a 32-player mode that Medal of Honor and Battlefield made standard close to 10 years ago? I'm supposed to be impressed with that?

svetzenlether

Previous CODs weren't made for 32 players. Some are, some aren't.

Avatar image for DangerousLiquid
DangerousLiquid

452

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 DangerousLiquid
Member since 2011 • 452 Posts

[QUOTE="DangerousLiquid"]

[QUOTE="eboyishere"]

but...what about the crowd that they care about the most consoles? :o, since everyone ask for them ;)

eboyishere

Dedicated on consoles? :| Except for Gears 1, I don't know any other game that did it great. :?

a nice amount on ps3 does, and gears 1 didnt have dedi servers brah

If Gears1 isn't, then what is on consoles?

Avatar image for DangerousLiquid
DangerousLiquid

452

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 DangerousLiquid
Member since 2011 • 452 Posts

[QUOTE="DangerousLiquid"]

[QUOTE="eboyishere"]here is the fun part i get laggy connection with the usually 6v6...so will they finally put in dedi servers or just let people lag out?:o....i think lag out :oeboyishere

It's already been announced that MW3 will support dedicated servers on the PC from day 1. ;)

but...what about the crowd that they care about the most consoles? :o, since everyone ask for them ;)

Dedicated on consoles? :| Except for Gears 1, I don't know any other game that did it great. :?

Avatar image for DangerousLiquid
DangerousLiquid

452

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 DangerousLiquid
Member since 2011 • 452 Posts

here is the fun part i get laggy connection with the usually 6v6...so will they finally put in dedi servers or just let people lag out?:o....i think lag out :oeboyishere

It's already been announced that MW3 will support dedicated servers on the PC from day 1. ;)