Fifa 11, the best football game ever made...ruined because of so many quiters, cheaters, glitchers.

Everytime i take a lead in the match i get the same thing everytime, the other player either quits or you get the connection stalling. Funny how it only seems to happen when you score and they see no way back.

What seems to happen is they must be tampering with the connection at their end or something. Also when you look at their gamerprofile, the data such as what game they are playing, teams used and score line do not reflect what is really going on and the "real" scoreline.

Tonight i was winning a match 4-1 and it was going into the 90th minute. Then suddenly the game freezes and stays that way. I look at the other players profile by pressing guide button and looking at players met, now it shows he is lossing 4-2 then a few minutes later it displays 4-3, yet the game has crashed in the last few seconds.

I reported this guy but i doubt anything will be done. In the end he set his status to away, probably went for a snack and left his xbox running. I usually don't give in an wait it out but this guy was gone for over an hour. Now my disconnect ratio is now at 2% because i was forced to leave the match although i was winning by 4 goals to 1.

Its ruining what is a really good game if you find someone who just wants to play properly.

So when i am not coming up against the quiters that simple go away when you score two many goals against them, or these system tampering cheats - the only time i get to the end of a match is when i am being beaten.

I hope the new patch coming out fixes these faults and stops it because the game is broken.

There is also a glitch when picking the teams - some players hover over AEK Athens in the "rest of the world" and chose them. But when you enter the match they are a CLASSIC ALLSTAR TEAM featuring some of the greatest players ever. This is unfair.

Im sure i am not the only one experiencing these problems.

This tampering and cheating makes me want to break the disc in half. Im not a quiter and always play fair - more than half my games end with the opponent quiting if i am winning or causing the thing to stall, glitch, freeze when i am in the lead. Only time i get the full match is when the other player is winning and i finish the game.

SORT THIS OUT PLEAAAAASSSSSSSSEEEEEE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I have never really got into the whole rock band guitar hero thing and was wondering if activision will ever think of making a game for drummers or snooker.

I have made a letter and that letter is been sent to them now. It might make them make the game that mak-eth the man!!!

IT HAS JUST HIT ME LIKE A BASEBALL BAT....

The original xbox is SO MUCH MORE BETTER THAN THE 360.

Here comes the facts

1. The console is alot cheaper

2. The games are going for low prices new and old

3. Cares more about giving players splitscreen modes

4. It looks delicious.

5. Better games: Brute Force, Midtown Madness, etc.

6. A better sense of "getting to know the controls controls"

7. You have a hugh collection of games and can enter every "nook and cranny"

So my 7 facts show cleary why Original IS BEST. I have done the math so you don't have to - now put your 360 away and come play with the big boys.

OH A ZINNNNGEEEERRRR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1

Call Of Duty, Tony Hawk, Tiger Woods, Fifa, Guitar Hero, Pokemon, Mario, Zelda, Metal Gear Solid, Rock Band, Madden.

"Pick the one in the middle Rock!" - that should work fine on xbox 360. i picture you looking at a choice of 3 so i repeat "PICK THE ONE IN THE MIDDLE...ROCK!"

Where did you find singularity at that price?? I want it too ^_^

SoftAsBaboonAss

I got the last copy, so sorry SOLD OUT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Been looking for a decent racing game for a while now. Bought Pro Street and Most Wanted but i wasn't too happy about either. Forza 3 is good but i'm lookin for something a bit more street. I have to admit that after NFS: Underground 2 most of them just became....crap. Is this one any different?AdrianDeWet

Short answer, No. But i haven't played it yet so don't PRESSSUURREE MEEEEE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

You can add to the list Call of Duty 2 if you want (Didn't have room in the poll).

My personal, vote goes out to Call Of Duty 3 (i remember the time i went on a 2 kill streak while hiding behind a dead cow out on the field. I was spotted but used my handgun to take out the target(s) and would have got to my house if it wasn't for a grenade that landed next to me. A standout moment, that i am yet to see in any of the other call of dutys.)

Oh and if you want, i will be on Call Of Duty 3 this weekend from 7am to 6pm with a 1hour or two in between for breaks. Sunday, i should be on a bit longer, you'll see me on most of the time. Gamertag ColofDutie99

Is it just me or is this a step back for the franchise. I just think that if you take Black Ops and put it up against the Battlefield 2 better that was Medal Of Honor - you always come away with a kinf of bitter taste in ones mouth. No, well let me lay it down for ye all.

Black Ops - Single players longer than MOH but MOH keeps things on a more realistic story. Black Ops uses guns that where not even around in that time.

Black Ops also just takes from previous games, and this is where it falls flat. Its not enough to act all gritty when you have bad voice actors that take any meaning out of the story.

MOH had a more realistic multiplayer, bigger maps, more open, not like the little maps of the call of dutys.

Oh, and before you call me a Fan Boy, know this, my favourite fps is Gears Of War and Gears of War2.

I don't think think Black Ops is a bad game by any means but i wouldn't give it more, than a 9.2.

Must try harder Microsoft.

I haven't played it, i won't pay that much for it, i would need to knock a wall through to stand at the recommended distance for it to work, the launch games look so bad - i wouldn't want to play them if given them, i can't see games being any better in this format.

I have also heard or read online and various podcasts that its slower to talk your way through menus and navigate the system than it is simply pressing and moving your xbox controller. A novelty if you ask me. Something that might be 'cool' for some, not worth it to me.

I was in a game shop about a month ago, and the guy behind the counter said "look at the video, thats kinect, its going to be great, like the wii in hd", i said how the games all looked very simple, for kids, or fans of dancing, party, games etc.He then said "oh, but you can move the dashboard around without a controller and talk and the system will do what you say", i said its a bit lazy and not worth it.

So what i am saying is that i had owned a wii and thought that got boring fast but when i look at the kinect i think the wii is far better. Kinect may have games coming out that are a bit more advanced than what the launch games where but i bet they will have to be simple enough that 'real' gamers will find it hard to be impressed atfer to long and see it for what it is.

Before the fan boys shoot me down for not even playing it yet, i say this - Judging by the limitatons and simplicity of the KINECT, it doesn't look like you are playing it either, just along for a very basic ride, having watched it in action it doesn't take much to imagine petting the air pretending im touching little cubs, or dancing in my room like an idiot (on, that note: id rather watch the geeks dancing with their kinect videos on youtube...much more entertaining).

Kinect or Gameroom? whats the worst idea.

I like xbox 360 over the other 2 consoles but kinect is just an expensive novelty which might please the 'non-gamers' but they should just stick to their wii's, nothing that standsout here, unless you like dancing by yourself and talking to a computer as your family pass by your door probably thinking "he has gone mental"!!!