[QUOTE="TekkenMaster606"][QUOTE="amtentori"]

wow

 

poor cows

cheatymcshifty

Pfft. I'm hoping for a PC version. Poor console sheep.

But you will miss out on playing it in HD.... I mean the 360 can do it.. .but you never hear about Pc's doing it

(and btw.. this is wrong, it hasent been confirmed, and in all likelyhood, the guy was talking about the ff13  FNC project, an I think everyone, except lems and sheep, (as in, cows and hermits) already knew that the other 3 games in the project, would probably be going to wii/360/ds/psp.. since 2 are going to ps3 already).

wow... just... wow

 

 

Wow that looks horrible :(

sexy_luigi

WOW TCHBO 

[QUOTE="Dead_Menn"] ... Thats a pretty long way of writing "I think the ps3 will sell the most". Do you actually believe M$ wont monopolize consoles like they did operating systems?Runningflame570

And Sony is any better? Seriously who is paying you?

Also I would like to see the link to bill gate's organizations only being self beneficial or I wont believe you!

[QUOTE="Dead_Menn"]*snip*Runningflame570

Calling me names and accusing me of things doesn't get you anywhere in any legitimate debate over any issue, unless its politics..and this certainly isn't.

Also I do realize Bill Gates has "donated" more money than anybody else in the world, I also realize that roughly 95% of their foundation's endowment goes into investments, of which about half is in companies that promote the very problems they claim to want to solve. That 5% coincidentally enough is just about enough money to cover income taxes.

Most of the links are either taken out of context, by analysts, business as usual (you'll likely find it at any business), or utterly contradictory of other links. The list needs to be cleaned up tons before it can be a valid complaint about Sony's conduct which I will admitt has been far from admirable.

Last time I checked Microsoft was the one running a 3.4 billion dollar viral marketing campaign, not Sony. Sony just gets caught more often as the attention is more focused on them and while we're at it, yes I do have a job.

My deep rooted hate for Microsoft is multi-faceted. Their failure to adhere to basic computing standards, their inherently insecure operating systems, and their monopolistic and innovation destroying activities. In addition, their utter disregard for other software developers (they've been convicted of software piracy), their disturbing influence upon government, and their near-criminal (and in some cases criminal) activities towards open-source which is certainly better than anything they've ever done.

Thats not all the grievances I have towards them either. IBM of the seventies and eighties was better than they are and thats saying something.

"Calling me names and accusing me of things doesn't get you anywhere in any legitimate debate"

Oh but insulting ones grammar does? You seem like the kind of pompous persona I hate.

Do you believe someone has to have perfect grammar to participate in a discussion or let alone be intelligent?  

Wow you must type fast :lol: I find it hilarious that you would come to system wars to find a "legitimate debate". Do you even own a console? It seems that your passionate hate for Microsoft is some how fueling your need to post on this board.

I am aware that almost ALL companies are greedy DUH that's commen sense. There just trying to make money for the share holders.  

And Windows is a perfectly fine OS, also Microsoft's list of faults isn't that bad and Sony is much worse of a company and has horribly low standers (selling refurbished TV's as "new" anyone?).

So what is it like writing all that on a DOS or Linux computer? Or are you a Mac guy?

[QUOTE="DXGreat1_HGL"] As many times as you regenerate this thread, it's funny that the cows still can't come up with anything plausible to contradict it....SambaLele

What about these: the OP avoided including any good news (yes, there's a lot and important ones) and the fact that the PS3 already sold around 1/3 what the 360 sold worldwide. That's 9.86 million 360s, that's a year and half on the market, with 1 year alone without competition and AAAs games since launch; agains 3.07 millions PS3s, facing competition, only 5 months on the market and no exclusive AAAs on launch. Just imagine how it will sell when those exclusive AAAs come out. It leads to the assumption that, now that the 360 is sharing the market with other 2 consoles, it can't sell like it used to, and it didn't even sell all that fast if you consider those numbers. So there's a high, pretty high chance of it losing it's first place and proudly taking the third one.

If Microsoft's activities regarding their illegal monopoly of the OS market can't be used as "ownage" here I fail to see how some of the stuff there can. While we're at it, why do so many contradict each other?

 

For instance:

 

Jan 29, 2007 - Sony Corp. may report third-quarter profit fell 50 percent after its flagship PlayStation 3 lost market share to Nintendo's Wii.

Jan 30, 2007 - Sony blamed the launching costs of its PlayStation 3 game console for much of the 5 percent drop in group net profit for the last three months of 2006

 

"and why are some that are by any reasonable measure good news show up on there?"

Sony loseing money is good news to you?

 

Jan 29, 2007 - Sony calls on Ken to save PS3 (which is actually about the forming of Cellius to make PS3 exclusive titles)

yeh and we all know how well the ps3 is keeping its exclusives!

 

Also I fail to see how this for instance:

 

Jan 10, 2007 - Senior VP of Marketing Peter Dille: Every Sunday in the paper, there's a new deal with a free controller or a free game or $100 off all discounting the 360. I don't think you take those measures if you're selling as expected. (see Jan 13, 2007 entry)

 

is made any less true relevant by the January 13th entry...especially considering EB Games does similar promotionals for many systems such as Xbox->360 and DS->DS Lite.

you must have failed to read the other posts because one of them is a link where Sony says that M$ must be desperate to sell 360's buy having a promotion like that... then goes and does the exact same thing

 

October 20th, 2006 - Announced that Sony may have to replace your PS3 controller for you after it no longer holds charge

 

How the **** is that bad news? Instead you could spend $70 for a 360 controller and rechargable battery pack or even more of batteries I suppose..

the point is that Sony batteries #### I'm surprised there not explodingRunningflame570

it seems you just go around threads reading posts and desperately try to bash lemmings and sheep why don't you try to find faults in the 100 other links about Sony?..... Oh wait that's because you can't! You /fail

Anyone would prefer the PS3 version of both titles most probably, not the 3 dvd's of  360 one, still i would not care if they did go to 360, i have both systems, so in fact i would like to see them on both, so i can compare as to which one is best

 In fact, i would probably buy both for both systems :)

badbreath23

Anyone would prefer the PS3 version of both titles most probably, not the 3 dvd's of  360 one, still i would not care if they did go to 360, i have both systems, so in fact i would like to see them on both, so i can compare as to which one is best

 In fact, i would probably buy both for both systems :)

badbreath23

???? Just like DMC4 ehh? Just like UT2K7?? EHHH Bio shock 360 exclusive allan wake 360 exclusive mass effect 360 exclusive assigns creed suppose to be ps3 exclusive. Listen man Microsoft has money they are possibly the most successful company of all time other then oil/electric companies, wile sony is in debt and have been losing money for years. Not to mention the PS3 flopped in sales harder then my pancake yesterday.meankilleR