serious? I do that all the freaking time It's so easy (but what part of that game isn't)

EDIT: you all do realise this is for 360 right?

@DrAmazinDood

I agree but it looks as if we are almost over the "cinematic experience" hump and games are starting to be games again.

@DrAmazinDood you know what they say, in Hollywood you fail upwards.

@DrAmazinDood

Thank you! my brain is still mostly mush here.

@DrAmazinDood

you'll see, we can't go much further. heck the cgi wank shows they have been showing us trying to flaunt what the next gen can do still don't look all that different from what we see now. the textures look slightly better and they seem to at least in those tech demos have worked out the hair physics but again you have to really REALLY look to see any difference.

It's time more people remembered art style instead of chasing after uncanny valley.

@Simplythebest12

I wish that would be what some of the definitive games of the next gen would look like. Glossy bright Cartoony aesthetics that is.

@bristalien

That makes it bad? There are some beautiful live arcade games.

@DrAmazinDood

You know you would save yourself a lot of energy if you just said "graphics don't equal good games grow up"

it's pointless writing long paragraphs trying preaching about it.

Also that point you are talking about I am pretty sure we already hit that. I mean who can really see the difference between next gen and the end of this gen.

@DrAmazinDood

Because it's a 2-D beatem up. I will defiantly support it I love 2-D but no I am not throwing 60 dollars at this, just like I didn't with Rayman.

I’m just one of those people who think games should be priced fairly if it’s a huuuge game like Skyrim (uuugh) then yes 60 is a fair price. But if it’s a smaller game then no. I realise I am not explaining myself well but hopefully you understand what I mean. Okay time to wake up.

I'm expecting something on the levels of Doom and Resident Evil bad.