I'm not paying 60 bucks for it.

So um, erm, who?

@Winzent They're already on their way with Capcom following not to far behind.

@chieflion

He's right. There should be more to an open world game then just being able to go where ever you like.

@rawkstar007 give it three years and you won't be.

@Acillatem1993

eeeh I think that one counts more as an game with sandbox levels. the open bits between levels I can't say count because...there isn't really a world there just grass and a boring horse ride.

@abnergoinbig seems like an easy way to get away with making not so good games and it will take a bit for people to notice. I mean look at Skyrim.

I swear if this wins over the News Room...

@Evanduil @Gen007

You have to understand to some of us all we can hear when Ubisoft speaks anymore is "CHACHING! CHACHING!"

@Pilgrim117

And that kind of comes back to what I said in my other post the first Arkham game wasn't open world, but it wasn't exactly linier either it had enough openness to create the illusion that it wasn't simply a one way go. That's what I would like to see brought back into video games. So far the only one I have seen with it aside from Batman is Bioshock Infinite. It’s linier but creates the illusion of openness.