DerveCreaves' forum posts

Avatar image for DerveCreaves
DerveCreaves

345

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 DerveCreaves
Member since 2013 • 345 Posts
Erhem:

[QUOTE="DerveCreaves"][QUOTE="DerveCreaves"][QUOTE="NineTailedGoku"]

Im sure you all read the latest article from Forbes this morning.Ms is a very rich company, but even throwing their money around, they have yet to dominate.MS isnt going to keep making consoles if they have yet to make profit overall with the Xbox brand. Theyre here to make money, not please its fanboys. Thats something the Xbox brand has yet to do. Even with their closest rival, Sony, making as many mistakes as they have this gen, MS couldnt get the job done. They failed against the Wii and PS3 despite having more than triple their combined market cap. MS needs to realize its passion for the business that will bring them ahead, not money. MS would rather throw 500 mil on marketing then make exclusive games. With Sony coming back to top form with PS4 (no 600 dollar price tag, easier to develop for, etc) MS wont have the advantage like they have this gen. So the question is, If MS couldnt get the job done this gen (coming in last place) with its competitors making mistakes, how are they going to manage with smarter competition. I think its time to put effort into more exclusives then wearing out the tired Halo, Gears, Forza cycle.

NineTailedGoku

1.They are making profit, the Xbox debt is now on Windows Phone and the Xbox brand SPECIFICALLY (not the whole entertainment division) is in the green. 2.Sony is here to make money to, elaborate on this. 3.How did they fail? They are in second place. 4.MS has more exclusive games than Sony. They also have better selling exclusive games, and XBLA and Kinect count. 5.You say that PS4 won't make the same mistake but they did. they slowed down their god speed popularity severely, and have hurt themselves. Not saying that they will fail, but MS is much more broad than they were before 2005, and is a large brand now. So i am not seeing how you think PS4 will have a better chance than the 360? Sony didn't really care about FP exclusives the PS1 and PS2 days, that's not the reason why people brought those systems to death. 6.MS is in second place. 7.It's not just Forza, gears, and Halo. I have no idea why you think that.

Notice I am actually tlaking about your post nine and you are not responding?

Better selling exclusive games?

www.vgchartz.com/gamedb/

IN order in millions(AA budget and up titles only, original Retail only in time frame): using VGcharts(lol): 2006: (Ps3)Genji:1Mill>Full Auto:200,000(360)=PS3 (PS3)RR7:1.31m>PDZ:740,000(360)=PS3 (360)Gears 1:5.98Mill>Resistance 1:4.11 Mill(PS3)=360 (360)N3:270,000>Railfan:9,000(PS3)=360 2007: (360)Halo 3: 11.71 Mill>Motorstorm:3.7Mill(PS3)=360 (360)Crackdown:1.69 Mill>Warhawk:1mill(PS3)=360 (360)PGR4:1.96Mill>Lair:470,000(PS3)=360 (PS3)Heavenly Sowrd:1.57Mill>Ace Combat6:940,000(360)=PS3 (360)Lost Odyssey:840,000>Folklore:250,000(PS3)=360 (pS3)R&C:ToD:2.41Mill>KuF:350,000(360)=PS3 (PS3)Uncharted:4.63Mill>?(360)=PS3 2008: (360)Too Human:750,000>Disgaea3:410,000(PS3)=360 (PS3)Valkria:1.09Mill>InfiniteUndis:650,000(360)=ps3 (PS3)Haze:930,000>Viva:TP:420,000(360)=ps3 (PS3)MGS4:5.72Mill>Fable II:4.09Mill(360)=ps3 (360)Gears2:6.50Mill>LBP:5.12Mill(Ps3)=360 (PS3)Socom:Confront:1.19Mill>BanjoN&B:710,000(360)=ps3 (PS3)Motorstorm:PR:1.24Mill>740,000(360)=ps3 (PS3)Resistance 2:2.34Mill>?=ps3 2009: (360)Halo Wars:2.27Mill>Demon Souls:1.67mill(PS3) (360)Halo3:ODst:6.12Mill>Killzone2:2.88Mill(PS3) (360)Forza3:5.33Mill>Yakuza3:1.04Mill(PS3) (PS3)GT5P>?(360) (PS3)Infamous>?(360) (PS3)Uncharted 2>?(360) (PS3)R&C:ACiT>?(360) (360 ran out of big(AA+) budget(not score) exclusives way to0 early and had most of them at the start of the year in 2009) 2010: (PS3)MAG:1.27Mill>DeathSII:220,000(360)=ps3 (PS3)Heavy Rain:2.26Mill>Crackdown2:1.05Mill(360)=ps3 (360)Halo: Reach:9.35Mill>GOW3:4.5Mill(PS3)=360 (360)Dance Central:2.94Mill>Yakuza4:870,000(PS3)=360 (PS3)Sports Champions:3.46Mill>Kinectimals:1.62Mill(360)=Ps3 (360)KinectAdv:19.73Mill>The Shoot:270,000(PS3)=360 (PS3)GT5:8.65Mill>Kinect Sports:5.48Mill(360)=Ps3 (360)Motionsports>?(PS3)=360 (360)Sonic Free Riders>?(Ps3)=360 (In 2010, both Sony and MS made the mistake of releasing the big core games early, and the PS3 ran out of AA budget exclusives at the end to compete.) 2011: (PS3)LBP2:2.83mill>Kinectsports2:2.10mill(360)=PS3 (PS3)Killzone3:2.40mill>Gunstringer:320,000(360)-=Ps3 (360)Gears3:5.73>Disgaea4:420,000(Ps3)=360 (360)Forza4:3.84Mill>Motorstorm:A:340,000(PS3)=360 (360)Dance Central3:1.87mill>Socom4:750,000(Ps3)=360 (PS3)Infamous2:1.52mill>Ravingrabbitkinect:210,000(360)=ps3 (360)HaloAnv:2.10Mill>Resistance3:1.25mill(360)=360 (360)Disneyland Adventures:2.09mill>R&C:All4one:980,000(PS3)=360 (PS3)Uncharted3:5.61mill>Seasamestreetkinect:410,000(360)=ps3 (Not counting 2012 as that will not gain sales legs until the middle of the year for both consoles.) Conclusions: Not before just counting that winners of each, the whole chart is based off Vgchartz(lol) since many users are using that for ownage(lol). So using Vgchartz, let us see if the PS3 does have as good or better software sales buy counting all the added totals of each whether they won or lost in the release timeline(not counting the times they did not have games to compete: PS3:79,899,000 Xbox 360:106,830,000 Difference:26,931,000 The Xbox 360 has over 26 million more software sales. Which is a ton. 2012 games need more legs grown for both consoles before adding it. Excluding the top 3 biggest selling Xbox games, which people clame are all the Xbox has, it would still be ahead by a considerable amount. Therefore TC's own logic does not work. What do you say about half your thread TC?
Avatar image for DerveCreaves
DerveCreaves

345

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 DerveCreaves
Member since 2013 • 345 Posts

[QUOTE="DerveCreaves"][QUOTE="DerveCreaves"][QUOTE="NineTailedGoku"]

Im sure you all read the latest article from Forbes this morning.Ms is a very rich company, but even throwing their money around, they have yet to dominate.MS isnt going to keep making consoles if they have yet to make profit overall with the Xbox brand. Theyre here to make money, not please its fanboys. Thats something the Xbox brand has yet to do. Even with their closest rival, Sony, making as many mistakes as they have this gen, MS couldnt get the job done. They failed against the Wii and PS3 despite having more than triple their combined market cap. MS needs to realize its passion for the business that will bring them ahead, not money. MS would rather throw 500 mil on marketing then make exclusive games. With Sony coming back to top form with PS4 (no 600 dollar price tag, easier to develop for, etc) MS wont have the advantage like they have this gen. So the question is, If MS couldnt get the job done this gen (coming in last place) with its competitors making mistakes, how are they going to manage with smarter competition. I think its time to put effort into more exclusives then wearing out the tired Halo, Gears, Forza cycle.

NineTailedGoku

1.They are making profit, the Xbox debt is now on Windows Phone and the Xbox brand SPECIFICALLY (not the whole entertainment division) is in the green. 2.Sony is here to make money to, elaborate on this. 3.How did they fail? They are in second place. 4.MS has more exclusive games than Sony. They also have better selling exclusive games, and XBLA and Kinect count. 5.You say that PS4 won't make the same mistake but they did. they slowed down their god speed popularity severely, and have hurt themselves. Not saying that they will fail, but MS is much more broad than they were before 2005, and is a large brand now. So i am not seeing how you think PS4 will have a better chance than the 360? Sony didn't really care about FP exclusives the PS1 and PS2 days, that's not the reason why people brought those systems to death. 6.MS is in second place. 7.It's not just Forza, gears, and Halo. I have no idea why you think that.

Notice I am actually tlaking about your post nine and you are not responding?

Better selling exclusive games?

www.vgchartz.com/gamedb/

IN order in millions(AA budget and up titles only, original Retail only in time frame): using VGcharts(lol): 2006: (Ps3)Genji:1Mill>Full Auto:200,000(360)=PS3 (PS3)RR7:1.31m>PDZ:740,000(360)=PS3 (360)Gears 1:5.98Mill>Resistance 1:4.11 Mill(PS3)=360 (360)N3:270,000>Railfan:9,000(PS3)=360 2007: (360)Halo 3: 11.71 Mill>Motorstorm:3.7Mill(PS3)=360 (360)Crackdown:1.69 Mill>Warhawk:1mill(PS3)=360 (360)PGR4:1.96Mill>Lair:470,000(PS3)=360 (PS3)Heavenly Sowrd:1.57Mill>Ace Combat6:940,000(360)=PS3 (360)Lost Odyssey:840,000>Folklore:250,000(PS3)=360 (pS3)R&C:ToD:2.41Mill>KuF:350,000(360)=PS3 (PS3)Uncharted:4.63Mill>?(360)=PS3 2008: (360)Too Human:750,000>Disgaea3:410,000(PS3)=360 (PS3)Valkria:1.09Mill>InfiniteUndis:650,000(360)=ps3 (PS3)Haze:930,000>Viva:TP:420,000(360)=ps3 (PS3)MGS4:5.72Mill>Fable II:4.09Mill(360)=ps3 (360)Gears2:6.50Mill>LBP:5.12Mill(Ps3)=360 (PS3)Socom:Confront:1.19Mill>BanjoN&B:710,000(360)=ps3 (PS3)Motorstorm:PR:1.24Mill>740,000(360)=ps3 (PS3)Resistance 2:2.34Mill>?=ps3 2009: (360)Halo Wars:2.27Mill>Demon Souls:1.67mill(PS3) (360)Halo3:ODst:6.12Mill>Killzone2:2.88Mill(PS3) (360)Forza3:5.33Mill>Yakuza3:1.04Mill(PS3) (PS3)GT5P>?(360) (PS3)Infamous>?(360) (PS3)Uncharted 2>?(360) (PS3)R&C:ACiT>?(360) (360 ran out of big(AA+) budget(not score) exclusives way to0 early and had most of them at the start of the year in 2009) 2010: (PS3)MAG:1.27Mill>DeathSII:220,000(360)=ps3 (PS3)Heavy Rain:2.26Mill>Crackdown2:1.05Mill(360)=ps3 (360)Halo: Reach:9.35Mill>GOW3:4.5Mill(PS3)=360 (360)Dance Central:2.94Mill>Yakuza4:870,000(PS3)=360 (PS3)Sports Champions:3.46Mill>Kinectimals:1.62Mill(360)=Ps3 (360)KinectAdv:19.73Mill>The Shoot:270,000(PS3)=360 (PS3)GT5:8.65Mill>Kinect Sports:5.48Mill(360)=Ps3 (360)Motionsports>?(PS3)=360 (360)Sonic Free Riders>?(Ps3)=360 (In 2010, both Sony and MS made the mistake of releasing the big core games early, and the PS3 ran out of AA budget exclusives at the end to compete.) 2011: (PS3)LBP2:2.83mill>Kinectsports2:2.10mill(360)=PS3 (PS3)Killzone3:2.40mill>Gunstringer:320,000(360)-=Ps3 (360)Gears3:5.73>Disgaea4:420,000(Ps3)=360 (360)Forza4:3.84Mill>Motorstorm:A:340,000(PS3)=360 (360)Dance Central3:1.87mill>Socom4:750,000(Ps3)=360 (PS3)Infamous2:1.52mill>Ravingrabbitkinect:210,000(360)=ps3 (360)HaloAnv:2.10Mill>Resistance3:1.25mill(360)=360 (360)Disneyland Adventures:2.09mill>R&C:All4one:980,000(PS3)=360 (PS3)Uncharted3:5.61mill>Seasamestreetkinect:410,000(360)=ps3 (Not counting 2012 as that will not gain sales legs until the middle of the year for both consoles.) Conclusions: Not before just counting that winners of each, the whole chart is based off Vgchartz(lol) since many users are using that for ownage(lol). So using Vgchartz, let us see if the PS3 does have as good or better software sales buy counting all the added totals of each whether they won or lost in the release timeline(not counting the times they did not have games to compete: PS3:79,899,000 Xbox 360:106,830,000 Difference:26,931,000 The Xbox 360 has over 26 million more software sales. Which is a ton. 2012 games need more legs grown for both consoles before adding it. Excluding the top 3 biggest selling Xbox games, which people claim are all the Xbox has, it would still be ahead by a considerable amount. Therefore TC's own logic does not work.
Avatar image for DerveCreaves
DerveCreaves

345

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 DerveCreaves
Member since 2013 • 345 Posts

[QUOTE="RR360DD"]

[QUOTE="Bigboi500"]

Other systems' exlusives are better and more abundant. Fact.

AM-Gamer

And yet the 360's library comes out on top by quite a large margin (use gamespot or metacritic, whatever you fancy)

And this is just retail games. Without doubt the 360 destroys the PS3 in arcade games too.

Yet you have no sources troll, not to mention the PS3 has outsold the 360 WW , get over it and move on.

Is the PS3 outsold the 360 WW how is the 360 second place? The amount of depression and suicide attempts when dealing with Universal Quality gaming like the Xbox 360 can be sad. but sometimes you just have to cope.
Avatar image for DerveCreaves
DerveCreaves

345

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 DerveCreaves
Member since 2013 • 345 Posts
[QUOTE="NineTailedGoku"]

Im sure you all read the latest article from Forbes this morning.Ms is a very rich company, but even throwing their money around, they have yet to dominate.MS isnt going to keep making consoles if they have yet to make profit overall with the Xbox brand. Theyre here to make money, not please its fanboys. Thats something the Xbox brand has yet to do. Even with their closest rival, Sony, making as many mistakes as they have this gen, MS couldnt get the job done. They failed against the Wii and PS3 despite having more than triple their combined market cap. MS needs to realize its passion for the business that will bring them ahead, not money. MS would rather throw 500 mil on marketing then make exclusive games. With Sony coming back to top form with PS4 (no 600 dollar price tag, easier to develop for, etc) MS wont have the advantage like they have this gen. So the question is, If MS couldnt get the job done this gen (coming in last place) with its competitors making mistakes, how are they going to manage with smarter competition. I think its time to put effort into more exclusives then wearing out the tired Halo, Gears, Forza cycle.

DerveCreaves
1.They are making profit, the Xbox debt is now on Windows Phone and the Xbox brand SPECIFICALLY (not the whole entertainment division) is in the green. 2.Sony is here to make money to, elaborate on this. 3.How did they fail? They are in second place. 4.MS has more exclusive games than Sony. They also have better selling exclusive games, and XBLA and Kinect count. 5.You say that PS4 won't make the same mistake but they did. they slowed down their god speed popularity severely, and have hurt themselves. Not saying that they will fail, but MS is much more broad than they were before 2005, and is a large brand now. So i am not seeing how you think PS4 will have a better chance than the 360? Sony didn't really care about FP exclusives the PS1 and PS2 days, that's not the reason why people brought those systems to death. 6.MS is in second place. 7.It's not just Forza, gears, and Halo. I have no idea why you think that.

Notice I am actually tlaking about your post nine and you are not responding?
Avatar image for DerveCreaves
DerveCreaves

345

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 DerveCreaves
Member since 2013 • 345 Posts
[QUOTE="ocidax"][QUOTE="DerveCreaves"]The Wii U is done. It was released with bad decisions and complete BS. "We will bring in teh hard core games" none new, and the ones they got were ports, and nearly 70% of all devs that said they would put games on it backed off. "the Wii U is more powerful" Show something that takes advantage of hardware first please. "These X games will be released at X time" almost all were delayed or canceled. "We will change the name of the console" By putting in a U at the end of Wii? That won't make people think that it's not a new system. Oh, people think it's not a new system? Opps. "Our software is selling" Like Mario and Nintendo land only? "We have a cheaper option for entry level consumers" The basic version with a game is more expensive than the Deluxe version which comes with a game. So many bad decisions. First THQ, than Atari, Than Nintendo is next if they don't pull through. I don't think even with japanese 3DS sales that I have been reading the last few days could save the Wii u since they are selling at a loss like the GBA saving the cube.

The Wii U is really far from Death. Nintendo have the weapons. That's the pros of have the best first party franchises. But they are going to wait for the PS4 or 720. Thats the strategy.

The illusion that they have the best FP and can survive off them make no sense. They would have been in dire trouble 2 gens ago if the GBA didn't have that massive 3rd-party support as well as the Gameboys before when the N64 was only succeding well in one region.
Avatar image for DerveCreaves
DerveCreaves

345

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 DerveCreaves
Member since 2013 • 345 Posts

Im sure you all read the latest article from Forbes this morning.Ms is a very rich company, but even throwing their money around, they have yet to dominate.MS isnt going to keep making consoles if they have yet to make profit overall with the Xbox brand. Theyre here to make money, not please its fanboys. Thats something the Xbox brand has yet to do. Even with their closest rival, Sony, making as many mistakes as they have this gen, MS couldnt get the job done. They failed against the Wii and PS3 despite having more than triple their combined market cap. MS needs to realize its passion for the business that will bring them ahead, not money. MS would rather throw 500 mil on marketing then make exclusive games. With Sony coming back to top form with PS4 (no 600 dollar price tag, easier to develop for, etc) MS wont have the advantage like they have this gen. So the question is, If MS couldnt get the job done this gen (coming in last place) with its competitors making mistakes, how are they going to manage with smarter competition. I think its time to put effort into more exclusives then wearing out the tired Halo, Gears, Forza cycle.

NineTailedGoku
1.They are making profit, the Xbox debt is now on Windows Phone and the Xbox brand SPECIFICALLY (not the whole entertainment division) is in the green. 2.Sony is here to make money to, elaborate on this. 3.How did they fail? They are in second place. 4.MS has more exclusive games than Sony. They also have better selling exclusive games, and XBLA and Kinect count. 5.You say that PS4 won't make the same mistake but they did. they slowed down their god speed popularity severely, and have hurt themselves. Not saying that they will fail, but MS is much more broad than they were before 2005, and is a large brand now. So i am not seeing how you think PS4 will have a better chance than the 360? Sony didn't really care about FP exclusives the PS1 and PS2 days, that's not the reason why people brought those systems to death. 6.MS is in second place. 7.It's not just Forza, gears, and Halo. I have no idea why you think that.
Avatar image for DerveCreaves
DerveCreaves

345

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 DerveCreaves
Member since 2013 • 345 Posts
[QUOTE="NamelessPlayer"]Steel Battalion was enough reason for me to warrant owning an original Xbox. Throw in other worthy exclusives like Panzer Dragoon Orta, Jet Set Radio Future, Metal Wolf Chaos, and generally the best versions of multiplatform releases (PC aside), and it's easy to see why it's a console worth owning. Meanwhile, the Xbox 360 had next to no exclusives worth talking about. The only exclusive game that really interests me is Shadow Complex, along with some enhanced ports of N64, Saturn, and Dreamcast titles, all XBLA stuff. That's it, really. Its predecessor console had more to offer for someone who primarily games on PC wherever possible.

There were more exclusives on the Xbox 360 differentiation from PC (and others) than the Xbox.
Avatar image for DerveCreaves
DerveCreaves

345

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 DerveCreaves
Member since 2013 • 345 Posts
I remember being int the marketing and design group for the Jaguar and being at E3 a few times.  Then they cut the budget, for no reason. Then they cut out all projects and abandoned them accept the Jaguar. Then they dropped development of a few other devices and wasted money. Which then they cut the budget again. Which then we got some good companies on board but had terrible advertising after launch. Do the math with the school teacher worked for awhile but that was pretty much the biggest we could afford. Then we started to recoup but to save money skimped on improving dev tolls and other dev assistance. Then that made the Jaguar unbearable by 1995. Then it seemed like dumb management stopped giving a fluck. Then at 1998ish that was pretty much it. Like 3 games showed up and most of the money was spend on project scraped for no real reason but managements stupid heads thinking things may not work. After the money was already wasted. Good times.
Avatar image for DerveCreaves
DerveCreaves

345

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 DerveCreaves
Member since 2013 • 345 Posts
[QUOTE="charizard1605"][QUOTE="DerveCreaves"]The Wii U is done. It was released with bad decisions and complete BS. "We will bring in teh hard core games" none new, and the ones they got were ports, and nearly 70% of all devs that said they would put games on it backed off. "the Wii U is more powerful" Show something that takes advantage of hardware first please. "These X games will be released at X time" almost all were delayed or canceled. "We will change the name of the console" By putting in a U at the end of Wii? That won't make people think that it's not a new system. Oh, people think it's not a new system? Opps. "Our software is selling" Like Mario and Nintendo land only? "We have a cheaper option for entry level consumers" The basic version with a game is more expensive than the Deluxe version which comes with a game. So many bad decisions. First THQ, than Atari, Than Nintendo is next if they don't pull through. I don't think even with japanese 3DS sales that I have been reading the last few days could save the Wii u since they are selling at a loss like the GBA saving the cube.

Lol

Indeed, hoepfully they will return to form shortly.
Avatar image for DerveCreaves
DerveCreaves

345

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 DerveCreaves
Member since 2013 • 345 Posts

[QUOTE="DarkLink77"][QUOTE="kuraimen"] Actually he provided a table that proves that some 3 or 4 pages ago...NineTailedGoku

Pretty sure Sony actually lost more money overall than MS did, as they blew all of the PS2's crazy profits on the PS3. Microsoft, on the other hand, broke even on the 360 and has starting chipping away at the Xbox's towering debt to the company.

Yes, they broke even on the 360 but not the Xbox brand. Thats the point ive been trying to make this whole thread. Its been proven over and over that MS has lost more money over all. Sony just lost more this gen because of their mistakes and misjudgements on the market.

The PS1 ans PS2 both made more profit than the Xbox lost up till the 2nd year of the 360 which they started making TRUE profit. They lost both those profits on the PS3. So using simple math, if Sony made more than what MS lost, and than Lost that, how did MS lose more OVERALL????