Neither of them. They should both have gotten a 9.5 Gta because the immersion of the game is often broken up by having to attend to friends and such which can be very boring later in the game when you have lots of friends. While MGS4 although the story telling was amazing, the cutscenes were just TOO many it really doesn't matter how amazing they were, there still were just too many for too long, there would have been easy ways to integrate those into gameplay, such as making the phone inside the gameplay or just having some of the conversations during battles and such.
Diametraphine's forum posts
Just because the failure rate is 2% it doesn't mean your not part of that two percent... Don't act so hurt if your system breaks then start trying to demonize Sony for apparently crying... That's being like Kevin Costner man... And Kevin Costner is not cool.
[QUOTE="MrJono789"] You gotta remember, many reviewers on here do their reviews strictly to opinion and their expierience, so if Kevin V gave it a lesser score than someone else, it just means either he has higher standards, or didn't enjoy it as much. That or he has no sense of fun and nitpicks way too much, but that is his job... Oh and every GS staff member is bought off by companys to give their games high scores and the people who don't pay them get bad scores, of course i'm joking again.CannedWormsYous actually raise a good point, with GameSpot's current advertisements of the game you would think they would be pressured into giving it a respectable score, obviously that's not the case. I commend GameSpot for not caving in to please their advertisers *cough* IGN *cough*.
Then again, the AVP developers have been sinking tonnes into advertisments for the game just so they can make a profit and hopefully stay in buissness, I actually saw an advert for it in the cinema when I went to see The Wolfman (They are paying me to mention it in my posts, i'm still not giving it a good score though :p) The only other time I have seen someone pay out that much for cinema advertisment was Gears 2. But still, in this economy you can't really blame someone for taking money to give a game a good score, luckily GS still has it's integrity... Unlike Kevin Costner... The ****
[QUOTE="MrJono789"]
Well... It was reviewed by Kevin v... See the Condemned 2 video review... The guy absolutley fails at reviewing.... Nah i'm only joking! I just find it hillarious how many people are complaining about it in the thread who have only either played the demo or none of the game at all.
But there are other people who have played the full game, and it has scored as high as 86% on reputable sites.Little suspicious much?
You gotta remember, many reviewers on here do their reviews strictly to opinion and their expierience, so if Kevin V gave it a lesser score than someone else, it just means either he has higher standards, or didn't enjoy it as much. That or he has no sense of fun and nitpicks way too much, but that is his job... Oh and every GS staff member is bought off by companys to give their games high scores and the people who don't pay them get bad scores, of course i'm joking again.Well... It was reviewed by Kevin v... See the Condemned 2 video review... The guy absolutley fails at reviewing.... Nah i'm only joking! I just find it hillarious how many people are complaining about it in the thread who have only either played the demo or none of the game at all.
Or... Just... You know?... Be... Normal? And... Wait? I mean, I have never even spoken to another human being and i'm sixteen in ONE month.
Log in to comment