So it turns out a whole subsegment of Gamespot members are into this capitalism v. marxism v. whatever socio-economics debate. I would have never known. Anyone who has been in the forums since 2001 will know GS forums are as politically charged as the New York Times online forums. I don't frequent the nytimes.com forums for that exact reason. Fortunately, gamespot has contained the politics to off-topic and general discussion areas. Even political and economic unions have arisen on a gaming news website. Marvelous!
In the market. . .and the marketplace of ideas freedom is the best fertilizer. The opinionated may be price setters. The vocal are heard. But a time and a place should exist for certain communication. To protect 1st Amendment rights, and the sensibilities of individuals who may be offended by certain language, the government has created time/place/manner restrictions for communication. There is a reason you don't see porn sold from the side of the road in Palo Alto, CA when the elementary schools are letting out. The vocal have lobbied to ensure that communication is relegated to other times and places. It is still protected, but is not displayed when it might be damaging.
On a similar note, I read about a group of interactive media aficianados who got together to create a petition to delay Heroes of Might & Magic. Impressive. I had a friend once who played it. She was in Colorado and I was in CA, but we never played together. I wasn't really interested in the game, and she didn't really play anymore. It was the ships passing in the night syndrome. But I digressed . . .
To think that a group of consumers of the video game industry got together and petitioned a developer/publisher for better product is marvelous. This is frequently seen in other industries (consumer goods, automotive, etc. . .) but I can't think of an instance where it was manifest in the gaming community.
This got me thinking about AO-rated games. If AO-rated games are likened to porn (based upon adult-oriented content and lacking artistic memrit) then it may stand to reason that they be relegated to certain times, sold at certain places, or distributed in a certain manner. If big retailers like Gamestop, Wal-Mart, or Target don't want to carry these hot potato(e)s, than perhaps move it online. Howard Stern's communication moved to satellite radio. One of the top 3 reasons people use the Internet is for pr0n. Perhaps well-intentioned groups should get together and petition to move AO to online rather than have the government regulate it. If developers and publishers continue to push the envelope, I would expect we will continue to see even liberal government push back. Nobody wants that.
Publishers lose money through litigation expenses, or by being the unwanted recipient of government taxes (expenses they would love to pass along to the consumer). Plus, there is the whole issue about the opportunity costs associated with certain peoples' time. Do we really want our Legislators debating whether or not to rename a popular, cafeteria side-dish when social-security and budget issues are waiting in the wings?
The marketplaces for ideas and for money each have limited shelf space. If we encounter issues contrary to our preferences, whatever they may be, should make our voices heard. That is the only way to ensure our words are heard, and our consumer preferences are made known. That, or we can vote with our money.
No I do not own a single GTA title. . . Not even Gran Tourismo A-Spec.
:wink:
Log in to comment