@suplax Because Arkham Origins was a particularly bad example of no innovation? I could easily have been convinced that it was Arkham City DLC if I hadn't followed the game's development. And if they hadn't annoyingly mucked with the controls...
@Tyler50314 Glad I'm not the only one thought so. All of the demos and trailers made it look like exactly what it ended up as: a good looking but incredibly shallow QTE-fest.
As a long time Ratchet fan, I honestly feel that this game has gotten a point too many here. It's a good game, and I'm enjoying it plenty, but at the same time it doesn't measure up to Crack in Time on pretty much any level.
@EnochRoot69 @Draconarius And by your logic, commentators have no responsibility to act like decent people and not launch into needless personal attacks. Which is the way you internet tough guys like it, I suppose.
@EnochRoot69 Or people could grow up and, y'know, act like remotely decent human beings when they make a comment on the site. I don't care what the reviewer writes, people have no business getting into personal attacks in response. Feedbackula is not the cause, either; other sites with nothing remotely similar to Feedbackula get it just as bad, if not worse.
TL;DR: The idiots who post insulting/abusive comments are at fault, not the person who wrote the article. To suggest otherwise is stupid.
@Qixote How is a 9.0 a 'controversial' score? If it had been given an 8 or a 7, I would agree, but how is 9 out of 10 (ie. damn near close to perfection) a bad or controversial score?
Well, that's our lot down under, apparently. We have to wait a month for everything, if we ever get them at all, and then pay a massive premium for the privilege. Blood-sucking sons of...
Draconarius' comments