Since both are being marketed toward the general public and not the serious gamer, it is obvious that Natal will walk all over Move. An average person will look at Move and the first thing they will think of is the Wii because in essence it is no difference. Natal on the other hand is a new and innovative concept, while it my not work well (like the Wii) it will surely sell well and take the world by storm.

Does this really affect your life that much? If it does, that is pretty sad.

By making it FREEAntiType

Whilst it may look slightly better, you must remember Killzone 2 is on a very small and linear scale. Halo Reach will be open world with many more enemies on the screen at the same time. Gameplay > graphics.

CryEngine 2

Anyone who says otherwise is wrong. It was delivering fully destructible environments back in 2007. No other engine comes close to the capabilities and performance ofCryEngine 2.

If currency is an issue, get Battlefield 1943. I put just over 300 hours into that game before it started to get a little dull. Plus it is a steal for such a low price.

Them there is pretty funny.

[QUOTE="civic_misfit"]

[QUOTE="TintedEyes"]Blu ray, it allows for games like U2 and GOW 3.GhoX

Naw. I prefer to sit through a lengthly install and then leave the game in my PS3 forever.

While it would be nice, I don't think it will happen. Nintendo seems to be setting a trend where they focus solely on Mario and Zelda, which is a real shame. It makes me sad to see all the series that could work well on the Wii yet have been totally ignored by Nintendo. Star Fox, F-Zero, and Kirby all have the potential to make excellent games that could successfully incorporate the motion controls, yet we will probably never see them.