@Daemoroth Thanks, that's quite an interesting read. @Beaker Yeah, the journey is great. I love Mass Effect 1 to 3, its just at the end of 3, everything you've done up o that point means nothing at all.
I thought I was over-thinking it, glad to know I wasn't the only one who thought the ending was pretty off. But what I do like about Mass Effect 3 is how, I believe, "human" the characters are. Definitely much greater than the first 2. Also, I didn't really like Jessica Chobot's character. I pretty much skipped most of her dialogue I didn't like her character design even from the trailers alone and I didn't like the voice acting all that much either.
@GeneralPatton Yeah I know, and I do agree, just stating some gamer's just don't want to go through bad action sequences or poorly made sequences, other's just want to experience the story without much effort on gameplay. That's why I actually mentioned the way Bioware is doing it with ME3.
I didn't even know this had occurred. I dunno what to say. @GeneralPatton Some people just find some gameplay boring and not very well done or just annoying when you have to constantly redo it. There's nothing wrong with that kind of choice. Personally however, I do like what they're doing with Mass Effect 3, having 3 Modes of Play, Action, Role Play, and Story, each playing to whichever kind of players prefer. The former being the more action oriented and latter being more story oriented with easier action sequences and the middle being the balance or standard play.
@Jonnybutler11 I don't either, but I found some stuff on wikipedia. I can't confirm the legitimacy of it though, they have Lionhead (Black & White, Fable) , 343 Industries (New Halo) and Turn 10 Studios (Forza) considered as 1st Party.
@X-7 I think.. Processor and RAM. I dunno about graphics card though.. I got a 9500GT and I still get the message saying "Run out of virtual memory" or something like that..
@Ultramarinus Uhh.. It looks like 2005? There is not one RTS that actually looks like SC2 that's from 2005. In fact RTS games that came out in 2005 don't look anything at all like SC2. Another thing, to fully run it.. You do NEED a beast machine. But if you just want to play, then you don't. But it won't look so great. It'll be slow and will look like those games that came out on 2005. But the fact that you NEED a beast machine explains that the graphics aren't poor at all :P
Elrax's comments