[QUOTE="Newmanfan14"]YESSSS! I almost thought that I was the only guy who thought TNA was an EPIC FAIL!!!!MizFitAwesome
TNA has a few good points but the bad clearly outweighs the good:
- Lower production value - The WWE clearly goes all out on every TV show whereas TNA looks like a sideshow at an amusement park
TNA fans should just face reality, the ONLY way Mondays Impact could outdraw RAW is if they pirate the RAW TV signal and pass it off as TNA. Then again, watching TNA these days almost seems like watching Raw from about 10 years age....
WWE goes all out? There too lazy to even change there set for every show any more, and that's why they have one set. And the set sucks. It's bland. All they do is change what's on the screen with the press of a button. TNA's set has an independent feel.Raw was actually pretty good 10 years ago. It really hasn't been good since WCW folded because they've gotten complacent, because they know their loyal fans will watch no matter how crappy they are. It's been stuffed down wrestling fans throats for so long, half of 'em don't know what a good wrestling show is anymore. And by the way, TNA is more like WCW was in the 90s, except more of the young guys get a push. The Giant was the only young guy who got pushed to the main event in late 90s WCW.
Log in to comment