[QUOTE="EsYuGee"]
[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"] funding bureaucracy does not aid any state.
Well then the recipient states should cut back on their bureaucracy and start living within their means.
money should not have to touch a thousand hands before it does its intended good. we should not have so much counterproductive policies. why does the fed give money to state governments at all? why does it tax and supplement farmers? with every department money goes through less comes out the other end and the difference is bureaucratic funding. how about the fed stops being the grand collector distributor and let the states take care of their own needs, let the farmers farm and find what is the actual cost of production and market rate for their product, end special oil subsidies and taxes, a little consistency would be nice, stop pandering to every lobby, if i had it my way they would not be able to pander to any lobby because these non-federal "issues". You're right. And most average Americans would probably agree with you. Everyone knows the problem in government on both state and federal levels is too much special interest money swirling around. The problem is once you add political ideology people don't think sensibly anymore. They adopt an "us vs them" mentality that damages everything. The amount of influence and power the federal government should possess and exert is always in flux and there is no perfectly definite balance. We might need a stronger federal government in some areas today but that doesn't mean it should always stay as powerful or as powerless in other areas indefinitely.
Log in to comment