Definitely Iphone over the other 2. Have you looked at Window Phone though. If you're with AT&T and maybe Tmobile, see what they have. You might be surprised.
EsYuGee's forum posts
[QUOTE="Diophage"][QUOTE="Setsa"]This is kinda why I'm so disappointed with the new James Bonds... They just don't feel like Bond films anymore. They're too much like every-other archetyical action flick, and there's no more over-the top gadgets or supervillians with cool lairs and insane schemes to take over the world or monopolize a market or just flat out wreak havoc. The new films just seem like every other action film.SetsaHmm, yeah, I felt that way about Quantum of Solace, but Casino Royale is pretty damn awesome. Quantum of Solace = uggghhhh in my eyes. Casino Royale wasn't that bad, and I was hoping that the next one would be more zany, but I was wrong. I did enjoy the stairwell fight, the blood tears, and the "torture" scene for mr. bond, made the whole film feel like a new generation of still over-the-top but cool Bond films were on their way, buuutttt solace let me down :( Oh yeah, the "torture". Who comes up with that stuff.
Totally agree. I think Pierce Brosnan was the best Bond, closely followed by Sean Connery.
Daniel Craig's bond really seems like a thug. The movies aren't light and fun anymore. They tried to make the series too serious and it resulted in a mushy pile of bleh.
[QUOTE="EsYuGee"] How have they proven to be an unstable country? Pakistan is more unstable than Iran is. And we give them millions of dollars in aid an equipment every year. Bane_09
Providing weapons and funds to terrorists organizations
If things were my way Pakistan wouldn't have nukes and they would recieve no funding
Because the US never funds terrorists right? (Iran-Contra anyone?). We were the ones who overthew Iran's democratically elected government and put the Shah in control, thus destroying Iran's democracy and setting the ground for what would later lead to the Iranian Revolution. The US has been destabilising countries since before any of us were born.looked bad but damn, 0% is going to sweep the Razzies though everything coming out these days looks horriblelamprey263Yup. Between this movie and Bucky Larson I'm not sure who's gonna "win" more. It's gonna be a good night for Sandler though.
[QUOTE="EsYuGee"]
What good could possible come of ANYONE having nukes?
For one, nuclear powers never going to war with each other. The U.S. would not attack Iran were they capable of actually launching nuclear weapons at the U.S.
Thanks for the input, but I already put than in at the bottom.[QUOTE="EsYuGee"]
[QUOTE="Bane_09"]
Perhaps using the word invading was wrong, I have no way of knowing what they would do for sure with them. But how could you possibly think Iran and North Korea having nuclear weapons would be a good thing? My speculation is based on their hate for the west and for anyone who does not think like they do. I could easily see the governments themselves using the nukes on their enemies, or said nukes falling into the hands of terrorists. I can't see any possible good coming out of Iran and North Korea having nukes, enlighten me if I am wrong and I will gladly admit my error
What good could possible come of ANYONE having nukes? I never said Iran and N Korea with nukes would be a good thing. I was addressing your thought on them invading another country. Iran hates "the west" and "the west" does what? Likes Iran? (I'm guessing both sides have mutual feelings). What do most Americans think about people who don't think like they do? I could easily see the US attacking Iran sooner than I see Iran attacking anyone else. What is it? 2 wars now. We just finished an adventure in Europe's largest oil supplier (Libya). Who is the US and "the west" going to attack next?I don't think any good can come from nukes except as a deterrent. Pakistan, India and Israel also have nukes. Where are the sanctions on them? I just think people are jumping the gun on Iran and projecting bad things on a country they don't understand. Kim Jong IL is a differnt story though.
I guess this where people simply disagree, I could see Iran easily attacking other countries if they had nuclear capabilities. And no sh*** we don't like Iran either, isn't this self evident?:? The difference is they have proven to be an unstable country and until that changes I see no reason why we should allow them to have nukes. Like you said it may be because we simply don't understand them...if that's the case hopefully our relationship with Iran will change someday but I don't see that happening
How have they proven to be an unstable country? Pakistan is more unstable than Iran is. And we give them millions of dollars in aid an equipment every year.America- F*** yeah!
They could have just licenced that slogan from the South Park guys. It's already comes with an hour and a half commercial included.
Who would they invade? Why would they invade them? What are you basing this speculation on?[QUOTE="EsYuGee"][QUOTE="Bane_09"]
If they had nuclear weapons they would be doing a lot more invading....
Bane_09
Perhaps using the word invading was wrong, I have no way of knowing what they would do for sure with them. But how could you possibly think Iran and North Korea having nuclear weapons would be a good thing? My speculation is based on their hate for the west and for anyone who does not think like they do. I could easily see the governments themselves using the nukes on their enemies, or said nukes falling into the hands of terrorists. I can't see any possible good coming out of Iran and North Korea having nukes, enlighten me if I am wrong and I will gladly admit my error
What good could possible come of ANYONE having nukes? I never said Iran and N Korea with nukes would be a good thing. I was addressing your thought on them invading another country. Iran hates "the west" and "the west" does what? Likes Iran? (I'm guessing both sides have mutual feelings). What do most Americans think about people who don't think like they do? I could easily see the US attacking Iran sooner than I see Iran attacking anyone else. What is it? 2 wars now. We just finished an adventure in Europe's largest oil supplier (Libya). Who is the US and "the west" going to attack next?I don't think any good can come from nukes except as a deterrent. Pakistan, India and Israel also have nukes. Where are the sanctions on them? I just think people are jumping the gun on Iran and projecting bad things on a country they don't understand. Kim Jong IL is a differnt story though.
[QUOTE="shakmaster13"][QUOTE="Bane_09"]
They work as a great deterrent, I can't see them ever being totally removed
How many countries has Iran tried to invade in the past century?If they had nuclear weapons they would be doing a lot more invading....
Who would they invade? Why would they invade them? What are you basing this speculation on?
Log in to comment