Gay people just want to be treated like everyone else. Forcing gay people into a story 'just because' is not treating them like everyone else. I don't go around shoving into other's faces that im straight. Infact in day to day life it doesn't really even come up. I don't know why everyone suddenly feels the need to force overt sexual desires in every single fucking character. In 99% of situations the sexuality of a character shouldn't even come up, and before someone says that they won't force it in, or it's not a big deal etc etc you have already lost the argument. It's already gotten a fucking article dedicated to the fact that there will be a gay character, it's deliberately putting this character in the spotlight because of their sexuality. Unless everyone writes articles about every other character and how they are straight or whatever, my arguments have already been validated.
@10mack10: My god, it's like my point went completely over your head. Can you even comprehend english? Your reply had literally nothing to do with my post. At all. You should feel embarrassed.
@louixiii: So i can earn my money with wins when I do a 2 round match on a CPU? Fighting real players and losing 50+ times does no one any good. People need CPUs to practice, the CPUs need to get incrementally harder, and once you are proficient THEN you can try and fight other people. It's a HUGE issue clearly, every single site is reporting on the lackluster single player mode. Then you get people commenting saying "LOL DOESN'T BOTHER ME 10/10!! SUCKS FOR YOU XD"
... The title of the article says that he takes too long to make games and that's a misconception. The actual article says that he sticks to his deadlines.
... Those are 2 completely -completely- different things. Sticking to your timeline/deadlines has no bearing on the fact that it the game takes a long fucking time to create. I create a game every 80 years, but I stick to my timeline so that means it doesn't take long. What kind of logic is this? I'm not saying X years is a long or short time to make a game, my opinion on that is neither here nor there. I'm saying the two ideas are not related to each other at all.
Was going to get this game, but with the lack of an Arcade mode or a simple vs CPU (none of that survival mode trash) I'll take my money elsewhere. Call me when the game is actually complete and I'll take another look. I could care less about online, but not much. Let me clarify, that I clearly do care the tiniest bit about online, but it's almost not worth mentioning. So my phrasing is indeed accurate. Capcom lost a lot of would be sales on this one. Finish your fucking games then release them, this shit is getting old, fast.
But hey, what can you expect considering the awful cash grab of a port that was SFIV on ps4.
I passed on the first game because im not paying 60 or even 40 for a game that literally relies on an online community in a genre that has game sequels every year or other year. When titanfall 2 comes out the first one will be worthless. It just as well would have never been made.
@Mogan: You ask what image and then you answer your own question FOR me with ""they've never really dealt with those very well from a PR perspective, and it took them a while to make a statement about it".. Y... you understand what a corporate image is, right? It's a view point of an institution or corporation that develops over time from a consumer base. Valve has gained a lot of brownie points with their sales and the recently implemented refund system. So whenever a screw up happens it's okay when Valve does it. To paraphrase from TB's talk about it, it's time to stop giving them a pass when they screw up. So yeah, that's called destroying their image. We need to take the rose colored glasses off of our eyes so we can call them out on their BS. There's not a single damn reason they couldn't have explained this on the day it happened or shortly thereafter. But no, they barely acknowledged it, and even when they did it wasn't on any sort of official steam outlet.
Evenglare's comments