Well, i downloaded the japanese RE5 demo not to long ago, and after playinng it for a awhile...i'm come to the conslution that, it kicks ass. Its pretty much RE4 on roids...i just wanna clear out that while the game looks like RE4, it plays so much different now, expecially with the shooter controls, it actually plays close to gears, with holding A to run and left and right triggers to aim and shoot. The game has a more slow pace to it, heavier if you will, it feels realistic and moves feel fluid. Some enviroments are destrucatable and the fire is insane, blow up a barrel and it sets the floor on fire for a short time, pretty sweet. physics A.I is pretty hard and now i see why its made for 2 players, animations while similar to RE4 it's better and has a bit more variety, another thing thats cool is you know how you can shoot doors, etc? well if you have one of those infected villages infront of one, and melee him when promped you can punch him straight through the door, its dam cool.

Now to graphics...the character models are the best i've seen in a console game, Better than MGS4 and gear 2. Draw distance is awesome envrioments look great and trees/foliage sway etc, but due to the bumped up models, the enviromental textures are toned down from what i've played, you won't see gears 2 or Resistance 2 like textures, but flat low rez mostly...but from a distance still looks great.

My only negative is...

A) Sheva your A.I buddy, while its an awesome addition to the game and survival feel, she gets kinda annoying, most of the time shoots down your enemies and pretty much heals you all the time, when down...which is cool, but the freedom of the game feels limited, i straight away thought of the classic Re's how it should only be you, alone, doing the single player...it gives it more of that surival horror feeling, but i guess team work is the concept for RE5.

B) Enemie bodies dissapear in bubbles like RE4, i wish they would just stay lifeless on the ground, adds to realism

C) Jumping across to platforms, chris looks weird doing it, seems unnatual...while its a small thing, it kinda bothers me.

so far thats it...feel free to ask any questions.

[QUOTE="Episode_Eve"][QUOTE="Bebi_vegeta"]

That's still not 1080p...

Bebi_vegeta

Didn't Sony said they would output games @ 1080p with 120FPS?

Since the title of this thread was about what Sony promised to be and showing that killzone 2 is finaly what PS3 was first promising to be, then I only assumed we were talking about 1080p.

Well anyway, 1080i is really short from being 1080p... since it's (1920x1080)/2 vs 1920 x 1080.

This is when developer hype goes too far. Don't shoot for the moon David if you cannot get off the ground.

And as far as I can tell, there have been plenty of games in the past 5-7 years that have been great at using "interactive entertainment."foxhound_fox

we all know its a loosing battle convincing lemmings / haters that KZ2 looks like the best game out on consoles visually.... Once KZ2 is out those not having a PS3 or else hating the PS3 will still say that Geow2 & RE5 look better because KZ2 is not available on 360... they'll hide behind the usual 'its my opinion' thing...

Even if the media states otherwise that KZ2 is better they simply wont accept it... PS3 haters only believe the media when they state that a specific multiplat title runs/looks better on 360, thats the only FACT they accept...

Reality though is showing that KZ2 looks simply amazing and is the best looking game which is available on consoles... (until some other title might come up which looks better)

(in any case PS3 owners win, cause they'll get to play both KZ2 & RE5......) :)

Malta_1980

[QUOTE="McdonaIdsGuy"]Jesus..uninformed people still think because it support 1080i means native lol.Patriot298

Yeah I know man, funny stuff! lol

The guy replied with a link saying it supported 1080I native..lol..lol. I said in my link that it could be upscaled to 1080i and lots of games do that this gen. Also 1080 isn't just 1080. Big pic difference in 1080i and 1080P NATIVE!

Jesus..uninformed people still think because it support 1080i means native lol.McdonaIdsGuy

[QUOTE="Eyezonmii"]RE5 isn't as complex as Killzone 2..so it can afford to look better, onces a full blown out war game, the other is an action surivival horror, etc. McdonaIdsGuy

did i say it was?

Killzone 2 STILL shows more impressive and techinical aspects, simply because it should, its a FPS war title. RE5, isn't...so much more can be added to character detail and other things.

those 30 characters on screen isn't something to brag about, expeically since each as basically the same actions and nothing unique. Play Resistance 2 if you wanna talk about ammount of enemies on screen.

again, from lighting, depth, draw distance, things on screen all happening at once, storms, dust etc....are much more techical in Killzone 2, you just won't see that ammount of detail in RE5, considering the game it is.

everyone who's played killzone 2 has pretty much confirmed it...you don;t see people who have played RE5, jumping up and down of how techinical it is and how amazing looking it is to the same extent of the reactions of killzone 2.

but anyways, wait and see....but so far, it is what it is.

[QUOTE="bigLLL"]its funny because resident evil 5 wont even be close to killzone 2 in graphics, but 360 owners will convince themselves it has better graphics than killzone 2 so they still feel like ps3 hasnt just jumped ahead in the graphics department with k2. Did killzone 2s graphics hurt your feelings lemmings?McdonaIdsGuy

:lol: its gonna be funny when this game flops-Mad_Rhetoric-