Eurogamer.net has put up their review - and they say the PS3 version looks exactly the same as the 360 version.

WHAT THE HELL? So what was with the demo?

thetruespin

Keyword "DEMO" lol

I really, really want the first three MGS games remade with MGS4 control scheme and graphics. That would make me buy a PS3 even if they cost $2000. noswear

the aiming is better in 4, imagine MGS3 remade with the crysis engine and MGS4 gameplay perspective.:o

MGS3 had a better story and ending by a little. But other than that everything else was better in MGS4.

So no, I still prefer 4 over 3.

I played the original MGS3 and I gotta say the camera sucks hardcore. I couldn't stand it.

Chutebox

Play MGS3: Subsistance. Much better.

Camera for the original didn't work well because most of it was OUTDOORS, so the camera was higher, unlike in 2, where is either in a building or facility, etc.

That review is poor BS specially after the comparisons and even 2k admiting the game wasn't as sharp as the 360 version,IGN has always been a sony fanboy website.MojondeVACA

Maybe, maybe not, but somethings definetly wrong, they said GTA4 looked sharper and better on the PS3 over the 360 verison, when the 360 version CLEARLY looked sharper and runs at NATIVE 720p. including having AA.

I love MGS4, story-wise..its intense, beutifull and memorable, More so than 3.

But gameplay-wise, i just feel MGS3 is better, i prefer the cover system they've replaced, being able to break necks and interigate your enemy. MGS3 story is also more simple and fun to play (thanks to some of the best boss fights/enemies, IMO)

Not only that, i prefer the Jungle setting. It always felt so right for a MGS game and overall stealth to be done in a jungle enviroment, very satisfying.

I was very dissapointed when MGS4 used a much slower and honestly UNEEDED cover/wall hug system, and replacing the neck breaking with a choke hold.

but i do feel MGS4 deserved a 10. MGS3 should have scored better tho. But still an AAA title (subsistance)

Thoughts?

[QUOTE="TheGrat1"]It came out first and was able to brainwash people into believing Sony was crap.Nedemis

u must really hate microsoft, then

Well i have seen both on HD TV and own both systems and I asked this same question today couple pages back and ended up with about 20 360 votes and 10 PS3 votes, In the end the 360 version is much clearer and brighter ( I know that is odd) than the Ps3 BLU RAY.

http://www.videogamer.com/videos/dead_space_dead_space_video_comparison.html?type=hi

Have a look at this and this is a great comparison.

teacher4tc

IGN state they are IDENTICAL.

[QUOTE="munkeypoo45"]because its made by mircosoft and microsoft is american. lolzdiped

Thats why the 360 has been doing very well in japan, and out selling the PS3?

We americans like to shoot thingsweb966

Lol, who doesn't?

human nature.