[QUOTE="FanofGames2"]Just get it on what you prefer to play on. ME is about the same on both versions apparently except for a redesigned menu system. Both have glitches, but they're not as bad as people make them out to becobrax75

oh how wrong you are.

this is all that's mentioned on the review

"None of the changes are drastic overhauls, but they do have an appreciable effect on the gameplay. One of the biggest tweaks is to the combat system. In the 360 version, you have to temporarily pause the action to use any weapons or biotic/tech powers beyond the one you currently have equipped. On the PC, this pause is still available, but weapons and powers have been consolidated onto one screen, along with squad commands which you can now issue inidividually. Pressing the space bar will bring up a heads-up display where you can change weapons or powers and issue commands to your squad. Odds are you'll use this pause very rarely, because your weapons are mapped to the function keys and your biotic/tech powers can be assigned to the number keys. "

Just get it on what you prefer to play on. ME is about the same on both versions apparently except for a redesigned menu system. Both have glitches, but they're not as bad as people make them out to be

Personally, I can't stand playing anything besides MMOs and RTSs on the pc so I'd say the 360

[QUOTE="FanofGames2"][QUOTE="Chutebox"]

No, you should get over it.

It scored a 9, it's not a flop. You don't like it, don't come here.

Chutebox

But at the same time Fable 2 is easily AAA.

Banjo will probably be underrated as well.

Why is it easily AAA? It's (just) below AAA status at gamerankings.

Move on...

Because it's awesome and pretty much everyone who has played it says this?

How can gamerankings be taken seriously when you have amateur review sites review games stupidly? For example, you know why halo 3 is a 94 at gamerankings despite the lowest score by any major site is a 9.5?

Because of these:

Seriously? A 7 for halo 3 with an article that states things that aren't even in the game (meaning happenings and facts, not glitches/ graphics, etc)? :|

just read it, if you played the game you'll be screaming in your mind to the reviewer, "You have not played this game!"

http://www.gamerankings.com/itemrankings/launchreview.asp?reviewid=811429

Does this not sound like a forum post?
"As for the solo campaign, let me be upfront and honest here and tell you what every other reviewing site seems to be afraid to tell you: the solo campaign is a huge letdown. From the very beginning, it was blatantly obvious to me that I was, once again playing half a game advertised and sold as a complete game. My theory is that Bungie had Halo 2 wrapped up and finished as the last game in the Halo series and was ready to ship on the Xbox, but Microsoft realized that if they ended it the way they wanted, there would be no Halo for the 360. Obviously, this would have been a financial catastrophe for Microsoft and the Xbox 360, so they ordered Bungie to make it so that there would still be some story left for a Halo game on the 360. As a result, we are left with two games that really should have been packaged as one. Halo 3 is about as long as Halo 2 was, which is not that long at all. Lame. "

Blue Dragon

Simply one of the best games this generation. So polished, spectacular environments and good graphics, good storytelling (decent story), fun gameplay, and overall it felt great. My one problem with the game was that you couldn't rotate your camera on the world map, lol.

Infinite Undiscovery is also pretty dang good, although I'd consider it a 8.0, an average good game. Lost Odyssey is kick*** but the majority here acknowledge this

No, you should get over it.

It scored a 9, it's not a flop. You don't like it, don't come here.

Chutebox

But at the same time Fable 2 is easily AAA.

Banjo will probably be underrated as well.

That is why MS is downsizing (now down to Lionhead, Rare, Turn 10, and Mistwalker).

-General_Ram-

You're slightly confused on this part

Microsoft owns Lionhead (fable) , Rare (banjo), Turn 10 (forza), two smaller XBLA studios, and Wingnut (hasn't made a game yet, working on halo chronicles w/ peter jackson and ryan payton)

They are 2nd party with Feel Plus (programmed Lost Odyssey, working on N3:2), Mistwalker (LO, Blue Dragon, working on Cry On), and Bungie (halo). This is essentially what Sony is to Insomiac and Naughty Dog, not direct ownership but partial and moreso contracts and $ binding the two.

Who cares?

Ill tell you right now, Banjo is more of a platfomer to me than Mirror's Edge.

I classify platformers by that certain feel.

In reality, if we're going to isolate these games, Ratchet is first, so dont go there cows!